2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New systematically modified vesamicol analogs and their affinity and selectivity for the vesicular acetylcholine transporter – A critical examination of the lead structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33,34 The binding affinity of (−)-FEOBV has been determined in vitro as 19.6 ± 1.1 and 209 ± 94 nM to rat VAChT and σ 1 receptors, respectively. 33,35 A study by Mulholland et al investigated the effect of different σ ligands on brain uptake and blood activity of [ 18 F]-FEOBV in mice at three different time points after injection using ex-vivo biodistribution. 19 Donepezil and (+)-3-PPP did not influence [ 18 F]-FEOBV uptake in different brain regions or radioactivity levels in blood.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33,34 The binding affinity of (−)-FEOBV has been determined in vitro as 19.6 ± 1.1 and 209 ± 94 nM to rat VAChT and σ 1 receptors, respectively. 33,35 A study by Mulholland et al investigated the effect of different σ ligands on brain uptake and blood activity of [ 18 F]-FEOBV in mice at three different time points after injection using ex-vivo biodistribution. 19 Donepezil and (+)-3-PPP did not influence [ 18 F]-FEOBV uptake in different brain regions or radioactivity levels in blood.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding affinity of vesamicol derivatives like [ 18 F]-FEOBV to σ receptors has been a topic of dispute. Some argued that most vesamicol-based radioligands, including [ 18 F]-FEOBV, should not be considered for VAChT imaging because of their binding affinity for σ receptors. , The binding affinity of (−)-FEOBV has been determined in vitro as 19.6 ± 1.1 and 209 ± 94 nM to rat VAChT and σ 1 receptors, respectively. , A study by Mulholland et al investigated the effect of different σ ligands on brain uptake and blood activity of [ 18 F]-FEOBV in mice at three different time points after injection using ex-vivo biodistribution . Donepezil and (+)-3-PPP did not influence [ 18 F]-FEOBV uptake in different brain regions or radioactivity levels in blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although benzovesamicol (BV) has higher affinity and selectivity for VAChT than vesamicol, several benzovesamicol (BV) analogs were synthesized to improve VAChT affinity and to decrease the affinity for sigma receptors ( σ 1 and σ 2 ). A BV analog with phenylpiperazine instead of phenylpiperidine in BV ( 5 ) [ 51 , 52 ], a BV analog with benzylpiperidine instead of phenylpyridine ( 6 ), and a BV analog with pyridinyl piperidine instead of phenyl piperidine ( 7 ) showed a lower VAChT affinity than BV [ 53 ]. The affinity of 7 to the σ 1 receptor increased.…”
Section: Vacht Imaging Agent Based On Vesamicol Analogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…imaging probe, PET, VAChT, vesamicol analog (Bar & Parsons 1986;Marshall & Parsons 1987), many vesamicol analogs have been developed as potential VAChT imaging agents for PET or SPECT (Azim et al, 2014;Bando et al, 2001;Barthel et al, 2015;Custers, Leysen, Stoof, & Herscheid, 1997;Efange, Michelson, Khare, & Thomas, 1993;Efange et al, 1994, Efange et al, 2000Kitamura et al, 2016;Kozaka et al, 2014;Mulholland et al, 1998;Shiba, Mori, & Tonami, 2003;Sorger et al, 2000Sorger et al, , 2008Sorger et al, , 2009. Furthermore, several reported vesamicol analogs were separated into optical isomers to improve in vitro and in vivo characteristics as VAChT imaging agents (Efange et al, 1994;Jung, Van Dort, Gildersleeve, & Wieland, 1990;Kovac et al, 2010;Li et al, 2013;Mulholland et al, 1998;Shiba et al, 2003Shiba et al, , 2009Tu et al, 2009Tu et al, , 2015Uno et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%