2017
DOI: 10.5817/am2017-1-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New technique for solving univariate global optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Piecewise Quadratic Bounds. Considering definition of the lower bound, the upper bound was constructed in [1] similarly. Assume that X = [a, b] be a bounded closed interval in R and f be a continuous differentiable polynomial with second degree on X.…”
Section: The Concavity and Convexity Test Detects The Regions Whethermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Piecewise Quadratic Bounds. Considering definition of the lower bound, the upper bound was constructed in [1] similarly. Assume that X = [a, b] be a bounded closed interval in R and f be a continuous differentiable polynomial with second degree on X.…”
Section: The Concavity and Convexity Test Detects The Regions Whethermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we divide the closed interval [0, 2] into the two equal parts such as [0, 1] and [1,2]. If we apply our method (concave convex test) on to f polynomial, we get f ([0, 1]) ≤ 0 implies that f is concave on [0, 1] and also {0, 1} is the set of roots of f due to the solutions of U 1 (x) = 0.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As "what is the best technique to find global optimum?" [28], [29] is still an open question, we measured the runtime of our algorithms in term of how many times they have to query for finding global optimum of a univariate function.…”
Section: Algorithm 4 Full Set Interdictionmentioning
confidence: 99%