2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00009-017-1036-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Techniques for Computing Geometric Index

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce new general techniques for computing the geometric index of a link L in the interior of a solid torus T . These techniques simplify and unify previous ad hoc methods used to compute the geometric index in specific examples and allow a simple computation of geometric index for new examples where the index was not previously known. The geometric index measures the minimum number of times any meridional disc of T must intersect L. It is related to the algebraic index in the sense that addin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By Theorem 1.3, the geometric index of T ′ 3 in h(T 1 ) is even. Since the geometric index of T ′ 3 in T 3 is two [1], the geometric index of T ′ 3 in h(T 1 ) cannot be 0 and so is at least two. Theorem 1.2 now implies that the geometric index of T ′ 3 in T 3 is at least 4, which is a contradiction.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Theorem 1.3, the geometric index of T ′ 3 in h(T 1 ) is even. Since the geometric index of T ′ 3 in T 3 is two [1], the geometric index of T ′ 3 in h(T 1 ) cannot be 0 and so is at least two. Theorem 1.2 now implies that the geometric index of T ′ 3 in T 3 is at least 4, which is a contradiction.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) If (i) and (ii) do not hold, then infinitely many of the m j satisfy m j ≥ 2 (and m j ≥ 1 for every j). Then by grouping the arrows in (1) in such a way that each group contains at least one element ≥ 2 we may assume that m j ≥ 2 for every j. It is then very easy to see that G is not finitely generated (the argument is essentially the same as in [2, Proposition 1.6]).…”
Section: Some Algebraic Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also clear from the construction that each γ j with j ≤ w has winding number 1 in V 0 while each γ j with j > w has winding number 0, so that γ has winding number w in V 0 . It only remains to check that the geometric index of γ in V 0 is precisely 2k + w. To see this we apply a technique of Andrist, Garity, Repovš and Wright [1]. The dotted radial lines in Figure 1.…”
Section: Toroidal Sets With Prescribed Cohomology and Self-indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations