New technological attributes and willingness to pay: the role of social innovativeness

Abstract

Purpose Integrating new technological attributes into existing products is a common way to innovate and is supposed to meet consumers’ functional needs. This paper aims to demonstrate how adding such attributes also increases willingness to pay (WTP) a premium for a product by activating consumers’ social need to feel unique. Design/methodology/approach The data were collected through a quantitative survey based on a nationally representative sample (N = 345). A choice-based conjoint analysis was used to estimate the perceived value of the new technological attribute and WTP a premium. Findings The perceived value of the new technological attribute has a positive effect on WTP a premium only for consumers with a high degree of social innovativeness (linked to their need for uniqueness) because they interpret this innovation as an opportunity to differentiate themselves from others. Practical implications When companies innovate by introducing new technological attributes, their communication should emphasize and trigger these attributes’ high performance and uniqueness. Thus, consumers seeking social differentiation through innovation will be much less sensitive to price and will be more prone to pay a premium for these products. Originality/value The main contribution of this article is to show that integrating and emphasizing a new technological attribute can increase consumers’ WTP a premium beyond that of the attribute’s functional value. Thus, new technological attributes will decrease the price sensitivity of consumers high in social innovativeness and increase their WTP a premium for the product, because they consider it as a means to stand out from others.

Analyzing Attitude towards COVID-19 Vaccine in the Context of the Health Industry: The Role of Country of Origin Image

“…Accordingly, innovative consumers tend to be consistent regardless of the product category. Innovativeness as a personality trait was used as a moderator variable in studies in the literature (30)(31)(32). Therefore, the innovativeness level of individuals is included as a moderator variable in the research.…”

Me and my AI: Exploring the effects of consumer self‐construal and AI‐based experience on avoiding similarity and willingness to pay

“…Similarly, providing recognition and hedonic values through smart services increases the willingness to pay a price premium in physical stores (Huang, 2018). This might occur because adding attributes perceived as valuable to new products reduces consumer price sensitivity, increasing willingness to pay (Sadik‐Rozsnyai & Bertrandias, 2019).…”

Virtual is so real! Consumers' evaluation of product packaging in virtual reality

“…Thus, this allows closing of the “attitude‐behaviour gap” (Viglia et al, 2021), since the gap between positive intentions towards sustainable practices and the less frequent adoption seems still relevant (Olson, 2022). CBCA is applied for evaluating consumer value and for inferring willingness to pay (Sadik‐Rozsnyai & Bertrandias, 2019). Packaging has been previously used for CBCA studies (Jensen et al, 2021; Meißner et al, 2020; Peukert et al, 2019).…”