1999
DOI: 10.1111/1468-005x.00055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New technologies and employment: industry and firm level evidence from Turkey

Abstract: Here the authors investigate the impact of new technology on employment at country, industry and firm level using evidence from a study of the Turkish chemical and engineering industries. They conclude by attempting to outline policy considerations related to the long term negative impact of technology on employment in developing countries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, a one percent increase in lnrd leads to go up overall employment by 0,273 percent. Unlike Ansal and Cetindamar Karaomerlioglu (1999), this result is consistent with Van Reenen (1997), Aksoy ( 2009), Piva and Vivarelli ( 2004), Lachenmaier andRottmann (2011), Bogliacino, Piva &, Cirera and Sabetti (2016), Piva and Vivarelli (2017), Aydın (2018), and Okumu, Bbaale & Guloba (2019). However, this relationship is the inversed U-shape.…”
Section: Empirical Findingssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, a one percent increase in lnrd leads to go up overall employment by 0,273 percent. Unlike Ansal and Cetindamar Karaomerlioglu (1999), this result is consistent with Van Reenen (1997), Aksoy ( 2009), Piva and Vivarelli ( 2004), Lachenmaier andRottmann (2011), Bogliacino, Piva &, Cirera and Sabetti (2016), Piva and Vivarelli (2017), Aydın (2018), and Okumu, Bbaale & Guloba (2019). However, this relationship is the inversed U-shape.…”
Section: Empirical Findingssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Unlike the previous studies, Ansal and Cetindamar Karaomerlioglu (1999) conclude that technology has clearly a negative impact on employment for the chemical and engineering industries over the period 1980-1993. Sumer (2018 shows that there would be significant losses in some occupational categories with routine tasks because of the process of Industry 4.0.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Although most mainstream economists subscribe to this view and reject any suggestion that technical progress is a possible cause of unemployment, international agencies started to express concerns from the early 1980s at the likely unemployment deepening effect of new technology in third world countries which had been largely passive recipients of such technologies. As has been shown elsewhere (for example Ansal et al 1999), the optimistic conclusion of neo-classical theory regarding the impact of new technology on employment is inconsistent with the realities in developing countries, at least in the short run. On the other hand, some initial studies (Fransman, 1984, Jacobson 1985 illustrated how adoption of new technology by East Asian producers of machine tools helped them to increase their market shares in world markets and with it the level of employment in the machine tool industries.…”
Section: Technology Adoption and Employmentmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As has been shown elsewhere (for example Ansal et al 1999), the optimistic conclusion of neo-classical theory regarding the impact of new technology on employment is inconsistent with the realities in developing countries, at least in the short run. On the other hand, some initial studies (Fransman, 1984, Jacobson 1985 illustrated how adoption of new technology by East Asian producers of machine tools helped them to increase their market shares in world markets and with it the level of employment in the machine tool industries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Turning our attention to the impact of trade over labor demand in a DC, the recent literature has recognized the failure of the traditional trade theory (expressed in the Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) and the 1 For examples on the ineffectiveness of compensation mechanisms in developing countries, see Karaomerlioglu and Ansal, 1999. They explain for instance that the first compensation mechanism concerned with employment in the capital goods sector is mostly inexistent in developing countries since they generally import their technologies rather than produce them locally. Therefore, the application of new technologies will not create substantial employment in the technology supplier sectors.…”
Section: Trade and Technological Change In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%