2014
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtu025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New technology-based firms in Europe: market penetration, public venture capital, and timing of investment

Abstract: We investigate the effect of public (PUVC) and private (PRVC) venture capital funds on the sales growth of 6,513 European New Technology-Based Firms (NTBFs) in the period 1992-2009. Our results show that PUVC-backed NTBFs underperform with respect to PRVC-backed ones, and do not grow more than non-VC-backed companies. The impact of PUVC is still not statistically significant (even though positive) when PUVC funds target young NTBFs. The only notable exception is when PUVC funds co-finance with PRVC funds and b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(96 reference statements)
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More interestingly, our analysis also shows that VC supply‐side thinness is responsible (at least to some extent) for slow demand‐side dynamics, justifying public policies aimed at sustaining the VC supply to trigger a virtuous cycle between the two sides of the market. Recent contributions have highlighted a positive role of government‐sponsored programs in the VC industry to the extent that policy intervention is willing to complement and increase private investment rather than play a leading role in the choice of the targets and the active management of investments (e.g., Bertoni & Tykvová, ; Brander, Du, & Hellmann, ; Brander, Egan, & Hellmann, ; Grilli & Murtinu, , ). The set‐up of hybrid public‐private funds, with the public actor playing a facilitating role rather than a leading one, may indeed increase the thickness of VC markets by acting as a pole of attraction for the supply of (internationally qualified) private VC investors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More interestingly, our analysis also shows that VC supply‐side thinness is responsible (at least to some extent) for slow demand‐side dynamics, justifying public policies aimed at sustaining the VC supply to trigger a virtuous cycle between the two sides of the market. Recent contributions have highlighted a positive role of government‐sponsored programs in the VC industry to the extent that policy intervention is willing to complement and increase private investment rather than play a leading role in the choice of the targets and the active management of investments (e.g., Bertoni & Tykvová, ; Brander, Du, & Hellmann, ; Brander, Egan, & Hellmann, ; Grilli & Murtinu, , ). The set‐up of hybrid public‐private funds, with the public actor playing a facilitating role rather than a leading one, may indeed increase the thickness of VC markets by acting as a pole of attraction for the supply of (internationally qualified) private VC investors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dummy variable captures whether the firm has practiced licensing as a technology buyer, that is, in the opposite fashion than the one investigated in this article. We then used the estimated coefficients of the first‐stage model to compute an adjustment term, the inverse Mills ratio corresponding to each year t , which we later inserted as control in the second‐stage panel regressions featuring licensing revenues as dependent variable (Semykina and Wooldridge, ; Grilli and Murtinu, ; Tzabbar and Kehoe, ). By accounting for the firm's likelihood to earn monetary returns from licensing each year of the dataset, this term helps minimize potential distortion in the analysis of interest and provides consistent estimates that generalize the results for the determinants of superior licensing volume to the larger sample (Dustmann and Rochina‐Barrachina, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical framework. Avnimelech and Teubal, 2006;Kenney, 2011b;Wonglimpiyarat, 2011;Revest and Sapio, 2013;Grilli and Murtinu, 2014). Critical to the development of this field is a greater understanding of how the three components of the equity finance value chain interact, particularly bringing in the perspective of the institutional investor (Brossard et al, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Role Of the Finance Ecosystem Formentioning
confidence: 99%