2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pgeola.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New theropod remains from the Tiourarén Formation (?Middle Jurassic, Niger) and their bearing on the dental evolution in basal tetanurans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temporal range, as well as the spatial range of spinosaurs is significantly increased when more ambiguous identifications are included. Oldest possible spinosaurid occurences include the isolated tooth described as Ostafrikasaurus from the Late Jurassic of Tendaguru ( Buffetaut, 2008 ; Buffetaut, 2012 though see Rauhut, 2011 ) and isolated teeth showing spinosaurid characteristics from the late Middle Jurassic of Niger ( Serrano–Martínez et al, 2015 ), and youngest have been reported from the Santonian of China ( Hone, Xu & Wang, 2010 ). Another possible spinosaur is Chilantaisaurus Hu, 1964, the systematic position of which has been a matter of debate ( Rauhut, 2003 ; Benson & Xu, 2008 ; Allain et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal range, as well as the spatial range of spinosaurs is significantly increased when more ambiguous identifications are included. Oldest possible spinosaurid occurences include the isolated tooth described as Ostafrikasaurus from the Late Jurassic of Tendaguru ( Buffetaut, 2008 ; Buffetaut, 2012 though see Rauhut, 2011 ) and isolated teeth showing spinosaurid characteristics from the late Middle Jurassic of Niger ( Serrano–Martínez et al, 2015 ), and youngest have been reported from the Santonian of China ( Hone, Xu & Wang, 2010 ). Another possible spinosaur is Chilantaisaurus Hu, 1964, the systematic position of which has been a matter of debate ( Rauhut, 2003 ; Benson & Xu, 2008 ; Allain et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tiouraren Formation has traditionally been regarded as Early Cretaceous (e.g., Moody and Sutcliffe, 1991;Sereno et al, 1994Sereno et al, , 2004, but Rauhut and López-Arbarello (2009) argued that it is considerably older, and probably Middle to earliest Late Jurassic in age. This assignment has been widely accepted since (e.g., Remes et al, 2009;Mudroch et al, 2011;Serrano-Martínez et al, 2015;van Damme et al, 2015), with most authors favouring a late Middle Jurassic age. This is the age assumed here as well.…”
Section: Theropod Faunal Changes From the Middle To The Late Jurassicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scarcity of information on theropod tooth morphology leads to taxonomic assignments on the basis of a priori assumptions of their phylogenetic affinities (Smith, 2005). The current literature contains many tooth-based taxonomic assessments based on scarce or poorly understood data (e.g., Soto and Perea, 2008;Buffetaut, 2011;Vullo et al, 2014;Mo and Xu, 2015;Serrano-Martínez et al, 2015. For example, the marginal undulations visible on the crown of some carcharodontosaurids is often considered as a key character of this clade, leading some authors (e.g., Chure et al, 1999) to assign isolated teeth to Carcharodontosauridae solely based on this feature when, in fact, it has a broader taxonomic distribution .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%