2019
DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Tools for Assessing Reactive Mineral‐Mediated Abiotic Contaminant Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, transformation reactions are commonly thought to occur at the mineral surface (not in the aqueous phase) (Butler and Hayes 1998) and reaction rates are influenced by mineral surface area, degree of ordering (crystallinity), pH, and mineral surface oxidation over time (passivation). Further discussion of these and other relevant iron minerals involved in the abiotic transformation of CVOCs can be found in ESTCP (2008); USEPA (2009), Cwiertny and Scherer (2010), He et al (2015), and Horst et al (2019). Some product vendors now offer injectable organic carbon‐based amendments that also include reduced iron and/or sulfur components to concurrently enhance both biotic and abiotic reduction processes.…”
Section: Integrated Biotic‐abiotic Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, transformation reactions are commonly thought to occur at the mineral surface (not in the aqueous phase) (Butler and Hayes 1998) and reaction rates are influenced by mineral surface area, degree of ordering (crystallinity), pH, and mineral surface oxidation over time (passivation). Further discussion of these and other relevant iron minerals involved in the abiotic transformation of CVOCs can be found in ESTCP (2008); USEPA (2009), Cwiertny and Scherer (2010), He et al (2015), and Horst et al (2019). Some product vendors now offer injectable organic carbon‐based amendments that also include reduced iron and/or sulfur components to concurrently enhance both biotic and abiotic reduction processes.…”
Section: Integrated Biotic‐abiotic Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, in situ anaerobic biostimulation groundwater remediation approaches are designed to leverage both biotic and abiotic contaminant transformation processes for chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs) (e.g., AFCEE, 2008; Davis & Owen, 2018; He et al, 2015; Horst et al, 2019; Kennedy et al, 2006). Biological CVOC transformation processes are well understood and can be readily evaluated by analysis of geochemical conditions and the creation of transformation products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, abiotic CVOC transformation is much more difficult to confirm, and its significance is not easy to distinguish from other processes that contribute to bulk attenuation rates (e.g., biotransformation, diffusion, sorption). Extensive research over the past two decades has greatly increased our understanding of the processes and controlling factors for CVOC degradation by the reducing power stored in reactive iron minerals and reactive iron mineral intermediates (e.g., Assaf‐Anid & Lin, 2002; Butler & Hayes, 1999, 2000; Cheng et al, 2020; Choi et al, 2009; Culpepper et al, 2018; Devlin et al, 2009; Fan et al, 2017; He et al, 2009, 2015; Horst et al, 2019; Jeong & Hayes, 2007a, 2007b; Lee & Batchelor, 2002a, 2002b; O'Loughlin et al, 2003; Schaefer et al, 2018a; Vikesland et al, 2007; Whiting et al, 2014; Yu et al, 2018). This increased understanding offers the potential to further leverage abiotic transformation processes and increase overall bulk contaminant transformation rates; however, currently most ERD designs do not specifically consider how to maximize complementary abiotic treatment processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact we have devoted attention to many in situ nature‐based treatment techniques as part of this regular column series, starting with in situ metals precipitation in 2009 and moving to engineered anaerobic bio‐oxidation, temperature‐activated auto‐decomposition reactions, and enhanced reductive dichlorination (Suthersan et al , , , ). Last year alone we wrote about reactive mineral‐mediated abiotic contaminant transformation, bioreactors for high concentration contaminant mixes, and bioremediation of 1,4‐dioxane (Horst et al , , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%