2000
DOI: 10.1080/00207720050197749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New trends in non-destructive evaluation in relation to the smart materials concept

Abstract: Periodical maintenance NDE-based inspections are today of a general acceptance for almost all complex technological structures. Nevertheless, the idea that the integrated and continuous sensing techniques can optimize the operating conditions is now in progress. Di erent aspects of this evolution towards health monitoring are discussed in relation with the smart materials concept through a non-exhaustive review of some realizations or experiences essentially focused on the ® eld of sensitive materials. Piezoel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would allow detecting the smallest change in ∆t even when the bandwidth of the measurement (W ) is limited. Figure (5) shows the reflection coefficient magnitude in the time domain for two time shifts, namely ∆t 1 and ∆t 2 . On the same graphs, the first seven steps of the sequence that would be obtained using IFFT are marked.…”
Section: A Shorted Rectangular Waveguidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would allow detecting the smallest change in ∆t even when the bandwidth of the measurement (W ) is limited. Figure (5) shows the reflection coefficient magnitude in the time domain for two time shifts, namely ∆t 1 and ∆t 2 . On the same graphs, the first seven steps of the sequence that would be obtained using IFFT are marked.…”
Section: A Shorted Rectangular Waveguidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maximum allowable error is set approximately as 25%, which is changeable according to the actual effect of damage detection. The converted values (AO) of the real outputs (RO) of cases EP1, EP2 and EP3 are also listed in table 4. From table 4 one can find that the results of cases EP2 and EP3 can accurately indicate the crack damage status of the plate specimens, and the average error of case EP3 is about 15%, but the average error of case EP2 is about 25%.…”
Section: Structural Dynamic Testing and Crack Damage Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibration responses at few spots of an in-service structure can be easily measured using the technology of piezoelectric smart structures (Gobin et al, 2000). However, the raw response signal in time domain cannot be used directly to identify structural damage quantitatively.…”
Section: Dynamic Finite Element Model Of a Sandwich Plate With Crack mentioning
confidence: 99%