2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2012.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New type curves for analyzing horizontal well with multiple fractures in shale gas reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brittleness is one of the most important mechanical parameters of unconventional gas shale reservoir estimation when it comes to hydraulic fracturing (Gasparrini et al 2014;Holt et al 2015) and borehole wall stability assessment and gas preservation risk (Ingram and Urai 1999;Hu et al 2014;Zhou et al 2014). Brittle shales are more likely to be naturally fractured and will also be more likely to respond well to hydraulic fracturing treatments (Nobakht et al 2013). Natural fractures may provide some reservoir space for shale gas but also may result in shale gas leakage .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brittleness is one of the most important mechanical parameters of unconventional gas shale reservoir estimation when it comes to hydraulic fracturing (Gasparrini et al 2014;Holt et al 2015) and borehole wall stability assessment and gas preservation risk (Ingram and Urai 1999;Hu et al 2014;Zhou et al 2014). Brittle shales are more likely to be naturally fractured and will also be more likely to respond well to hydraulic fracturing treatments (Nobakht et al 2013). Natural fractures may provide some reservoir space for shale gas but also may result in shale gas leakage .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All shale gas reservoirs are not the same and there are no typical tight gas reservoirs (Kennedy, et al, 2012). Multi-fractured wells completed in shale gas reservoirs are difficult to analyse quantitatively due to a combination of unique reservoir properties (eg, non-static porosity and permeability, desorption, non-Darcy flow) and potentially complex induced hydraulic fracture geometries (Nobakht, et al, 2013). Conventional reservoir simulators cannot provide, without alteration, a reasonable production analysis for shale gas reservoirs (Xie, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Unconventional Gas Reservoir Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, type curves are pre-plotted solutions to the [reservoir] flow equations, such as the diffusivity equation, for selected types of formations and selected initial and boundary conditions (Lake & Fanchi, 2006). Type curves, showing either flow rate over time or cumulative production over time is a common tool used to describe the performance of a reservoir in unconventional gas well (Nobakht, et al, 2013;Mingqiang, et al, 2016;Sugiarto, et al, 2015;Burgoyne & Clements, 2014;Aminian, et al, 2004;Baihly, et al, 2010;Karacan, 2013;Mavor, et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multi-stage fracturing technology for horizontal wells can activate the pre-existing natural fractures and generate a complex fracture network called stimulated reservoir volume (SRV), which has become the most effective method to develop shale resources [1]. Generally, SRV is defined as the part of the drainage area impacted by hydraulic fractures and concomitant reactive fractures, where the productivity of shale gas well could be effectively improved [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%