2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-018-5787-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New ultra-sensitive radioanalytical technologies for new science

Abstract: Recent developments in radiometric and mass spectrometry technologies have been associated in the radiometric sector mainly with underground operations of large volume Ge detectors, while the mass-spectrometry sector, represented mainly by accelerator mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry has become the most sensitive technique for ultra-low-level analyses of long-lived radionuclides. These new developments have had great impact on investigations of rare nuclear processes and appli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the shape of the track length spectra induced by radiogenic backgrounds can be calibrated by studying the track length distributions in mineral samples with large concentrations of 238 U . Finally, the 238 U concentration in a given sample can be measured using, for example, mass spectrometry or gamma ray spectroscopy [141,142]. Hence, we expect the uncertainty on the radiogenic background predictions to be much smaller, and we assign them a (relative) systematic error of ±1%.…”
Section: Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the shape of the track length spectra induced by radiogenic backgrounds can be calibrated by studying the track length distributions in mineral samples with large concentrations of 238 U . Finally, the 238 U concentration in a given sample can be measured using, for example, mass spectrometry or gamma ray spectroscopy [141,142]. Hence, we expect the uncertainty on the radiogenic background predictions to be much smaller, and we assign them a (relative) systematic error of ±1%.…”
Section: Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The choice c Φ ν = 100 % is motivated by the fact that neutrinoinduced backgrounds could potentially vary by an O(1) factor over ∼ Gyr [27][28][29]. Radiogenic backgrounds, on the other hand, do not vary with time and are only controlled by C. Through a combination of direct C measurements in samples [144,145] and calibration studies with high-C samples, the shape and normalization of the radiogenic-induced background can be measured; we therefore assign c C n = 10 %. Mineral samples can be dated to few-percent accuracy using geological dating techniques [146][147][148], therefore motivating c T n = 5 %.…”
Section: Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the shape of the track length spectra induced by radiogenic backgrounds can be calibrated by studying the track length distributions in mineral samples with large concentrations of 238 U . Finally, the 238 U concentration in a given sample can be measured using, for example, mass spectrometry or gamma ray spectroscopy [141,142]. Hence, we expect the uncertainty on the radiogenic background predictions to be much smaller and assign them a (relative) systematic error of ±1 %.…”
Section: Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%