2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2003.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New upper bounds for free linear and nonlinear vibration systems with applications of the differential calculus of norms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measure has also been studied for vibration systems [8], climate modeling [16] and ground vehicle dynamics [5]. It has also been used as a cost objective in determining feedback controllers for fluid flow and other systems [2,9,15,23], and controller design methods have been proposed to minimize this measure [11,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure has also been studied for vibration systems [8], climate modeling [16] and ground vehicle dynamics [5]. It has also been used as a cost objective in determining feedback controllers for fluid flow and other systems [2,9,15,23], and controller design methods have been proposed to minimize this measure [11,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the IVP x = A(t)x,x(t 0 ) = x 0 with A(t) = A(t + t p ) in a similar way as for x = Ax,x(t 0 ) = x 0 , more precisely, it was possible to derive an upper bound on x(t) of the same form as for the case of a constant matrix. Further, in [7], the same held for the quasilinear IVP x = Ax + h(t, x),x(t 0 ) = x 0 . Therefore, one can be optimistic to carry over the results of the present paper to the case of an IVP with periodic system matrix and to the case of a quasilinear IVP.…”
Section: Outlook On Future Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The upper bound y = 1,2 (t) 2 depends on x 0 and adapts faster to the curve y = y(t) 2 than the upper bound y = Y 1,2 e 0 (t t 0 ) ; but, in the initial domain, y = 1,2 (t) 2 is worse than y = Y 1,2 e 0 (t t 0 ) . This can be remedied, however, by the method described in [7].…”
Section: Two-sided Bounds On Y(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare old upper bounds with the new upper bounds depending on x 0 , and also give new lower bounds on x(t). The optimal constants in the bounds are computed by the differential calculus of norms developed by the author in earlier work, see [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In Section 6, we draw some conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%