1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-6995(94)80137-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous(Berriasian) Ammonite faunas from the Sembar formation (“Belemnite shales”) of Southern Baluchistan, Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussion.-Upper Tithonian occurrences of Kossmatia from Argentina, Cuba, Mexico, and the USA were reported by Burck hardt (1906,1912), Krantz (1928), Kellum (1937), Imlay (1943Imlay ( , 1980, Cantu-Chapa (1967, 1976a, 1982, 1993, Imlay and Jones (1970), Verma andWestermann (1973), Hoedemaeker (1987), Myczynski (1989), and Oloriz et al (1999). Kossmatia has also been recovered in the Indo-Pacific area (Sukamato and Westermann, 1992;Enay and Cariou, 1999;Fatmi and Zeiss, 1999) and Spain (Tavera-Benitez, 1985). However, reservations concerning its systematic position, age, and presence in Mexico, Cuba, and the USA (California, Texas) have been raised, as noted previously in this paper.…”
Section: Emended Diagnosis-moderatelymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Discussion.-Upper Tithonian occurrences of Kossmatia from Argentina, Cuba, Mexico, and the USA were reported by Burck hardt (1906,1912), Krantz (1928), Kellum (1937), Imlay (1943Imlay ( , 1980, Cantu-Chapa (1967, 1976a, 1982, 1993, Imlay and Jones (1970), Verma andWestermann (1973), Hoedemaeker (1987), Myczynski (1989), and Oloriz et al (1999). Kossmatia has also been recovered in the Indo-Pacific area (Sukamato and Westermann, 1992;Enay and Cariou, 1999;Fatmi and Zeiss, 1999) and Spain (Tavera-Benitez, 1985). However, reservations concerning its systematic position, age, and presence in Mexico, Cuba, and the USA (California, Texas) have been raised, as noted previously in this paper.…”
Section: Emended Diagnosis-moderatelymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Hybonoticeratinae was again proposed by Callomon (1981) without reference or comments on the previous proposal made by Olóriz (1978). Reference to the subfamily Hybonoticeratinae has been common since the 1980s but involving different proposals: (1) Hybonoticeratinae Olóriz, 1978 (by Rossi, 1984; Olóriz et al, 1993, 2000; Olóriz and Villaseñor, 1999; Fatmi and Zeiss, 1999; Myczyński, 1999; Zell et al, 2014); (2) Hybonoticeratinae Neumayr, 1878 (by Sarti, 1984; Vigh, 1984), most probably by re-interpretation of the footnote no. 1 by Neumayr (1878, p. 70[34]); (3) Hybonoticeratinae Callomon, 1981 (by Schlamp, 1991; Pathak, 1993; Schlegelmich, 1994; Schweigert, 1998); (4) Hybonoticeratinae without reference to an author (by Krishna and Pathak, 1993); and (5) Hybonoticeratinae Callomon, 1981 (by Sarti, 1993; Howarth, 1998; Enay, 2009, who modified the composition interpreted by Callomon to a quasi-identical coincidence with the one made by Olóriz, 1978).…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may wonder if the presence of a ventral groove might not result from extreme intraspecific variation of B. peroni or reflect a phyletic link with M. microcanthum. In any case, it is clear that the genus Aulacosphinctes should be limited to its type species Ammonites mörikeanus Oppel, 1863 and those closely allied Indian and Malagasy taxa described by Oppel (1863), Uhlig (1910), Besairie (1936), Collignon (1960) and Fatmi (1973).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%