“…Readings introduced students early on to the view that the experiences of sexual and gender minorities provided a basis for theory (e.g., Brown, 1989;Hale, n.d.), while psychological science about sexual and gender minorities was often heterosexist (Herek, Kimmel, Amaro, & Melton, 1991) and often shaped by politics and history (Kitzinger, 1997;Minton, 1997). Nature-nurture debates about sexual orientation were represented on the reading list primarily through a discursive psychology paper on biology in the first year the class was taught (Hegarty, 1997), and a paper integrating biological and constructionist approaches to the development of sexual orientation in the second year that the class was taught (Hammack, 2005).…”