New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Expanding and Evaluating Motives for Environmentally Responsible Behavior

Abstract

This article contends that while striving to promote environmentally responsible behavior, we have focused attention too narrowly on just two classes of motives. There is a need to expand the range of motives available to practitioners and to provide a framework within which motives can be evaluated for both their immediate and long-term effectiveness. The article then examines a strategy for promoting environmentally responsible behavior that has significant potential. This strategy is based on a particular form of motivation called intrinsic satisfaction. Nine studies are reviewed that have outlined the structure of intrinsic satisfaction. A key theme discussed is the human inclination for competence. This fundamental human concern is shown to have both a general form and a resource-specific version.Although the search for motives effective at promoting environmentally responsible behavior (ERB) is being enthusiastically pursued, the work so far has been somewhat confined. The vast majority of attention has been given to only two motivations: providing material incentives and disincentives sufficient to make the behavior worth attending to and focusing on the altruistic reasons for engaging in the behavior. There has been relatively little exploration of other, potentially more useful alternatives.Early attention was given to the use of incentives and disincentives. Scott Geller and his colleagues explored the effectiveness of incentives and disincentives in promoting ERB and established that such behavior can be motivated by the manipulation of material reward, whether token or real (Geller, 1987(Geller, , 1992 Geller, 509

Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012

“…The failure to engage in energy efficiency can be characterized as a market failure: individuals lack the relevant information or knowledge to engage in energy saving behaviors (DeYoung, 2000;Hungerford and Volk., 1990;Schultz, 2002) and acquiring such information is costly. Therefore detailed and immediate feedback is a frequently proposed solution to remedy wasteful energy use patterns (Van Houwelingen and Van Raaij, 1989).…”

Neutralisation and Mental Accounting in Ethical Consumption: The Case of Sustainable Holidays

“…Some research into individual sustainable behaviour has highlighted the spillover phenomenon between different types of home or daily behaviours (e.g., energy saving, purchasing, habitual [38,39]). Some studies have proposed mixed findings regarding the spillovers between sustainable practices [40].…”

Sustainability as a Priority at Major U.S. Department of Energy’s Defense Sites: Surrounding Population Views

“…However, when the interaction is based on 2-6 cases, which was the case in some of these analyses, the match is meaningless, because of the small sample size. Hence, to produce meaningful categories for the "worried about the site" variable (range, 1-10) and the aggregate trust variable (range, 1-30), we created four categorical variables: "very worried" (range 8-10) and "not worried" (range, 1-3) and "low trust" (range, 1-10) and "high trust" (range, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Prior to creating the trust scale, the six measures of trust were tested as a single scale with Cronbach's alpha.…”

“…Likely, there are differences in the extent to which the public prioritizes different aspects of sustainability. The risk perception and preference literature suggests a fairly economic approach, i.e., that the public prioritizes those policies they perceive to directly benefit them [28][29][30][31].…”