New Zealand Emergency Department COVID-19 Preparedness Survey

Abstract

Objective This research sought to assess the level of COVID-19 preparedness of Emergency Departments (EDs) in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) through the views of Emergency Medicine specialists working in District Health Boards around the country. Given the limited experience NZ hospitals have had with SARS-CoV-2, a comparison of current local practice with recent literature from other countries identifying known weaknesses may help prevent future healthcare worker infections in NZ. Methods A cross-sectional survey by convenience sample of New Zealand Emergency Specialists in November 2020 to evaluate preparedness of engineering, administrative policy, and PPE use. Results A total of 137 surveys were completed (32% response rate), revealing heterogeneity in NZ ED clinical work environments in November 2020. More than 10% of emergency specialists surveyed reported no access to negative pressure rooms. N95 fit testing was not done on 15 (11%). Most specialists (86%) work in EDs that cohort patients, about one-third (34%) do not use spotters during PPE doffing, few have policy regarding breaches in PPE, and most do not have required space for physical distancing in non-clinical areas. Initial PPE training, simulations and segregating patients were widespread but appear to be waning with persistent low SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. PPE shortages were not identified in NZ EDs, yet 13% of consultants did not indicate they would use respirators during aerosol generating procedures on COVID-19 patients. Treatment interventions including non-invasive ventilation and high flow nasal cannula were common. Many respondents reported high levels of stress attributable to predicted inadequate staffing and the state of overall preparedness in event of a second wave. Conclusions New Zealand emergency specialists identified significant gaps in COVID-19 preparedness, and they have a unique opportunity to translate lessons from other locations into local action. Proactive identification of weaknesses in hospital engineering, policy, and PPE practice in advance of future SARS-CoV-2 endemic transmission would be prudent.

COVID‐19 and geriatric medicine in Australia and New Zealand

“…23 Emergency specialists in New Zealand were not worried about PPE shortages but identified gaps such as adequate physical distancing. 24 Health-care workers from a large Melbourne hospital were concerned about contracting the infection and infecting their family, access to PPE and redeployment. 25 General practitioners felt well prepared for the pandemic, and their main issues were about the availability of PPE, stress and information overload.…”

“…Australian emergency care workers believed that their workplace was well prepared for the COVID‐19 pandemic, but many were concerned about the availability of PPE and reported an increase in their workload 23 . Emergency specialists in New Zealand were not worried about PPE shortages but identified gaps such as adequate physical distancing 24 . Health‐care workers from a large Melbourne hospital were concerned about contracting the infection and infecting their family, access to PPE and redeployment 25 .…”