2010
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.135947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newborn Screening for Galactosemia: A Review of 5 Years of Data and Audit of a Revised Reporting Approach

Abstract: Background: Availability of the galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase (GALT) assay for newborn (NB) screening has improved identification of classic galactosemia. Previously defined critical cutoffs for total galactose (Gal), typically 1.110 mmol/L (20 mg/dL), are still in use in laboratories measuring total Gal for the diagnosis of nonclassic galactosemias. Urgent notification/referral to a treatment center follows, although few of the NBs will need treatment. Methods: We reviewed all NB gala… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase assay for newborn screening [19] would prevent misdiagnoses in patients affected by galactosemia. Unfortunately a screening program for this disorder is not available in all countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase assay for newborn screening [19] would prevent misdiagnoses in patients affected by galactosemia. Unfortunately a screening program for this disorder is not available in all countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some states also measured total galactose (galactose + galactose-1-phosphate); however, some measured total galactose in all samples (e.g., SC) while others measured total galactose only in samples already flagged by a borderline, low, or absent GALT activity level (e.g., GA, MI, NY, OH). Further, not every state that measured total galactose used that information in the Note: Testing strategies used by specific labs may change over time; these are the responses received at the time requested (2011-2012) a GALT activity was measured using a coupled assay that produced NADPH so that mM NADPH produced in a given period of time corresponded to a given level of GALT activity in the sample (Freer et al 2010)) decision of whether or not to flag a sample as abnormal for galactosemia, and some states also had a special approach to NBS if the baby had been transfused prior to sample collection.…”
Section: Detection Methods and Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Georgia detected close to 20 DG cases per 100,000 newborns screened, while Mississippi detected a median of fewer than 5. This difference likely reflects, at least in part, the differing GALT cutoff levels used by the two states: in Georgia a sample showing <60 mM (NADPH) (Freer et al 2010) GALT activity was defined as abnormal, whereas in Mississippi a sample needed to show <40 mM (NADPH) GALT activity to be declared abnormal (Table 2).…”
Section: Prevalence and Detection Of Duarte Galactosemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,9,[19][20][21][22][23] This study shows a new NBS blood collection, the 3-hour stop-PN protocol, can significantly reduce falsepositive AA results and the associated medical costs. The current study confirms and expands the results of a smaller study of the effect of holding AA containing PN by Morris et al 23 The current study includes a much larger sample size of VLBW infants (87 vs 413 in this study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%