2022
DOI: 10.1002/ped4.12343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newborn screening for genetic disorders: Current status and prospects for the future

Abstract: Newborn screening (NBS) is a public health service aimed at identifying infants with severe genetic disorders, thus providing effective treatment early enough to prevent or ameliorate the onset of symptoms. Current NBS uses biochemical analysis of dried blood spots, predominately with timeresolved fluorescence immunoassay and tandem mass spectrometry, which produces some false positives and false negatives. The application of enzymatic activity-based testing technology provides a reliable screening method for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chinese researchers continue to report results of pilot studies of various gene panels potentially applicable to genetic NBS: a 573-gene panel in combination with biochemical screening [ 471 ]; a 134-gene panel for 74 inborn disorders [ 472 ]; a 465-gene panel for 596 disorders as part of the Newborn Screening with Targeted Sequencing (NESTS) program in eight hospitals across China and one hospital in Beijing [ 473 ]; and a 135-gene panel for 75 disorders [ 474 ]. Related reports provide updates on the current status of genetic NBS and a look at the future [ 475 ], the use of NGS as a first-tier screening test [ 476 ]; the current attitudes and preconceptions on genetic NBS in the Chinese reproductive-aged population [ 477 ], the value of combining traditional NBS and genetic screening to reduce false negatives and to improve the early/accurate identification of CH [ 478 ], the viability of incorporating genetic screening for neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency (NICCD) into the current NBS program [ 479 ]; and the identification of increased numbers of actionable variants with fewer false-positive NBS results with WGS [ 480 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chinese researchers continue to report results of pilot studies of various gene panels potentially applicable to genetic NBS: a 573-gene panel in combination with biochemical screening [ 471 ]; a 134-gene panel for 74 inborn disorders [ 472 ]; a 465-gene panel for 596 disorders as part of the Newborn Screening with Targeted Sequencing (NESTS) program in eight hospitals across China and one hospital in Beijing [ 473 ]; and a 135-gene panel for 75 disorders [ 474 ]. Related reports provide updates on the current status of genetic NBS and a look at the future [ 475 ], the use of NGS as a first-tier screening test [ 476 ]; the current attitudes and preconceptions on genetic NBS in the Chinese reproductive-aged population [ 477 ], the value of combining traditional NBS and genetic screening to reduce false negatives and to improve the early/accurate identification of CH [ 478 ], the viability of incorporating genetic screening for neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency (NICCD) into the current NBS program [ 479 ]; and the identification of increased numbers of actionable variants with fewer false-positive NBS results with WGS [ 480 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usage of genetic testing in NBS has increased recently due to the tremendous advancements in this field. In general, diseases with unusual clinical presentations, complex phenotypes, and multigene pathogenicity can be treated with technologies like Sanger sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and NGS sequencing, which includes panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing [ 19 ]. When compared to genetic testing, NGS is a highly efficient method as it simultaneously sequences huge panels of genes in a single assay.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations for the treatment of the same cancer species of different molecular types are also different. [8][9][10] The mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) system is the most important indicator for CRC classification, which is used to formulate treatment strategies. MSI is a code-shifting mutation of microsatellites in tumor cells caused by the insertion or deletion of duplicate units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%