2004
DOI: 10.1177/1461444804042520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

News in Online and Print Newspapers: Differences in Reader Consumption and Recall

Abstract: How readers consume and recall news presented in online and print versions of two newspapersin the Netherlands are investigated in this experimental study. Few differences are found between the online and print versions in terms of news supply. Reader attention to the news stories varies, depending on the newspaper and news category. No consistent reading pattern is evident and the print version readers do not read more than the online version readers. News Consumption seems to be more dependent on the news ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, this research reinforces an idea that has been pointed out in other investigations into different types of online audiences: sociodemographic variables are becoming increasingly less relevant for the discrimination of consumer behavior related to the news on the Internet (D'Haenens, Jankowski, & Heuvelman, 2004;Fortunati et al, 2014;Media Insight Project, 2014). The distinction between digital native and legacy online news brands does not succeed in activating those segmentation variables that are so important for marketing management.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…On the one hand, this research reinforces an idea that has been pointed out in other investigations into different types of online audiences: sociodemographic variables are becoming increasingly less relevant for the discrimination of consumer behavior related to the news on the Internet (D'Haenens, Jankowski, & Heuvelman, 2004;Fortunati et al, 2014;Media Insight Project, 2014). The distinction between digital native and legacy online news brands does not succeed in activating those segmentation variables that are so important for marketing management.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This, combined with a more limited screen size, allows fewer cues at one glance that could lure users into reading something they did not plan to (Althaus & Tewksbury, 2002;Engebretsen, 2006, Eveland, Marton, & Seo, 2004. Almost immediately users have to click and scroll, and are encouraged-even forced-to pursue their individual path and to select information that matches their own interests (d 'Haenens et al, 2004, Mensing & Greer, 2006Prior, 2005;Tewksbury, 2003;Tewksbury & Althaus, 2000;Watters, Shepherd, & Burkowski, 1998). Certainly, determined print readers also can skip sections that they are not interested in and read "out of order," but for users of hypermedia this is the structural norm (Eveland & Dunwoody, 2002).…”
Section: Communication Channels and The Public Agendamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, such services are not always suitable for many readers and for different reading situations (Flavian & Gurrea, 2006).A newspaper reader may, for example, want to read articles from a number of daily and weekly newspapers and magazines while traveling, say, to work or on a business trip (D'haenens, Jankowski, & Heuvelman, 2004). It may be both annoying and time-consuming to scan a number of different newspapers for interesting and important articles.…”
Section: Electronic Newsmentioning
confidence: 99%