News Media Framing of Childhood Obesity in the United States From 2000 to 2009

Abstract

The American public holds mixed views about the desirability of government action to combat childhood obesity. The framing of coverage by news media may affect citizens' views about the causes of childhood obesity and the most appropriate strategies for addressing the problem. We analyzed the content of a 20% random sample of news stories on childhood obesity published in 18 national and regional news sources in the United States over a 10-year period (2000-2009). News media coverage patterns indicated that by 2003, childhood obesity was firmly on the news media's agenda and remained so until 2007, after which coverage decreased. We identified changes in news media framing over time and significant differences according to news source. News coverage of causes of childhood obesity that were linked to the food and beverage industry increased in the early years of the study but then decreased markedly in later years. Similarly, mention of solutions to the problem of childhood obesity that involved restrictions on the food and beverage industry followed a reverse U-shaped pattern over the 10-year study period. News stories consistently mentioned individual behavioral changes most often as a solution to the problem of childhood obesity. Television news was more likely than other news sources to focus on behavior change as a solution, whereas newspapers were more likely to identify system-level solutions such as changes that would affect neighborhoods, schools, and the food and beverage industry.

Who’s Responsible? Media Framing of Pediatric Environmental Health and Mothers’ Perceptions of Accountability

“…For example, Kim and Willis (2007) found that between 1995 and 2004, American news media consistently framed childhood obesity as a personal problem, though a balance in individual and societal attributions of responsibility for causing and solving the issue was reached in later years. In a similar analysis of news from 2000 to 2009, Barry and colleagues (2011) found that most stories (75%) mentioned at least one cause of childhood obesity and most often mentioned individual behavioral changes (e.g., diet or exercise) as a solution. They also detected significant differences in frames across media sources, such that newspapers were more likely than magazines to identify system-level solutions (e.g., legislative, regulatory or industry modification) than individual changes.…”

La obesidad infantil: estado de la cuestión y posibles líneas de investigación futura

“…Dentro de las investigaciones que usan esta metodología, la técnica más empleada es el análisis de contenido (Saguy y Almeling, 2008;Hilbert y Ried, 2009;García y Díez, 2009;Saguy y Gruys, 2010;Bastian, 2011;De Brún, McCarthy, McKenzie y McGloin, 2013). En segundo lugar la encuesta (Evans, Renaud y Kamerow, 2006;Dixon, Scully, Wakefield y otros, 2007;Barry, 2009) y el uso de experimentos y modelos matemáticos de simulación (Chou, Rashad, y Grossman, 2008) se encuentran de forma residual.…”

Reporting risk, producing prejudice: How news reporting on obesity shapes attitudes about health risk, policy, and prejudice

“…There are different ways in which body weight is framed and blame and responsibility for excess weight are discussed Barry et al, 2011;Lawrence, 2004;Saguy, 2013). While media accounts are typically multivocal, the contemporary U.S. media primarily portray "obesity" as a health problem caused by bad personal choices .…”