News Media Use, Talk Networks, and Anti-Elitism across Geographic Location: Evidence from Wisconsin

Abstract

A certain social-political geography recurs across European and North American societies: As post-industrialization and mechanization of agriculture have disrupted economies, rural and nonmetropolitan areas are aging and declining in population, leading to widening political and cultural gaps between metropolitan and rural communities. Yet political communication research tends to focus on national or cross-national levels, often emphasizing networked digital media and an implicitly global information order. We contend that geographic place still provides a powerful grounding for individuals’ lifeworld experiences, identities, and orientations to political communications and politics. Focusing on the U.S. state of Wisconsin, and presenting data gathered in 2018, this study demonstrates significant, though often small, differences between geographic locations in terms of their patterns of media consumption, political talk, and anti-elite attitudes. Importantly, television news continues to play a major role in citizens’ repertoires across locations, suggesting we must continue to pay attention to this broadcast medium. Residents of more metropolitan communities consume significantly more national and international news from prestige sources such as the New York Times, and their talk networks are more cleanly sorted by partisanship. Running against common stereotypes of news media use, residents of small towns and rural areas consume no more conservative media than other citizens, even without controlling for partisanship. Our theoretical model and empirical results call for further attention to the intersections of place and politics in understanding news consumption behaviors and the meanings citizens draw from media content.

Most users do not follow political elites on Twitter; those who do show overwhelming preferences for ideological congruity

“…In this project, we offered a foundational overview of political biases in following, sharing, and annotating on a large national scale, looking at the most powerful, and therefore potentially most frequently followed, political elites ( 52 ). Yet, some recent work suggests that contentious political issues are also discussed at the state level and that patterns of media use, political talk, and policy attitudes differ between localities within states ( 62 , 63 ). Future work should test whether similar biases in the following, retweeting, and quote tweeting of in-group versus out-group politicians and news media organizations emerge on local levels.…”

Who Will Tell the Stories of Health Inequities? Platform Challenges (and Opportunities) in Local Civic Information Infrastructure

“…This tangled set of findings requires a more nuanced understanding of the power of place and its role in community storytelling. As Wells et al (2021, 6) argue, “Location and communication dynamics intersect to shape the sense citizens make of their political circumstances.” These discourse patterns are related to community history and demographic composition in complex ways.…”

Country Roads and Cityscapes: Examining the Relationship Between Place-Based Identity and Feelings Toward Journalists

“…This logic has also been applied to how people living in these different parts of the country use and think about media in the United States. For example, scholars have noted differences in the use of (Beaudoin & Thorson, 2004; Hindman & Beam, 2014) and trust in (Hmielowski et al, 2021; Wells et al, 2021) media, depending on where people live, with people in rural areas using more local news, fewer prestige news outlets (e.g., The New York Times ), and reporting lower levels of trust in media compared with those living in urban parts of the country.…”