2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/5865200
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

News Video Classification Model Based on ResNet-2 and Transfer Learning

Abstract: A large amount of useful information is included in the news video, and how to classify the news video information has become an important research topic in the field of multimedia technology. News videos are enormously informative, and employing manual classification methods is too time-consuming and vulnerable to subjective judgment. Therefore, developing an automated news video analysis and retrieval method becomes one of the most important research contents in the current multimedia information system. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presently, the feature extraction and processing of videos are divided primarily into textual and audio-visual features. Textual features relate to the content information of video clips, while audio-visual features derive from the physical characteristics of sound and images [5]. Initially, video feature extraction primarily focused on extracting textual features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, the feature extraction and processing of videos are divided primarily into textual and audio-visual features. Textual features relate to the content information of video clips, while audio-visual features derive from the physical characteristics of sound and images [5]. Initially, video feature extraction primarily focused on extracting textual features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi, as publisher, following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of systematic manipulation of the publication and peer-review process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%