Newsprint coverage of smoking in cars carrying children: a case study of public and scientific opinion driving the policy debate

Abstract

BackgroundMedia content has been shown to influence public understandings of second-hand smoke. Since 2007 there has been legislation prohibiting smoking in all enclosed public places throughout the United Kingdom (UK). In the intervening period, interest has grown in considering other policy interventions to further reduce the harms of second-hand smoke exposure. This study offers the first investigation into how the UK newsprint media are framing the current policy debate about the need for smoke-free laws to protect children from the harms of second-hand smoke exposure whilst in vehicles.MethodsQualitative content analysis was conducted on relevant articles from six UK and three Scottish national newspapers. Articles published between 1st January 2004 and 16th February 2014 were identified using the electronic database Nexis UK. A total of 116 articles were eligible for detailed coding and analysis that focused on the harms of second-hand smoke exposure to children in vehicles.ResultsComparing the period of 2004–2007 and 2008–2014 there has been an approximately ten-fold increase in the number of articles reporting on the harms to children of second-hand smoke exposure in vehicles. Legislative action to prohibit smoking in vehicles carrying children was largely reported as necessary, enforceable and presented as having public support. It was commonly reported that whilst people were aware of the general harms associated with second-hand smoke, drivers were not sufficiently aware of how harmful smoking around children in the confined space of the vehicle could be.ConclusionsThe increased news reporting on the harms of second-hand smoke exposure to children in vehicles and recent policy debates indicate that scientific and public interest in this issue has grown over the past decade. Further, advocacy efforts might draw greater attention to the success of public-space smoke-free legislation which has promoted a change in attitudes, behaviours and social norms. Efforts might also specifically highlight the particular issue of children’s developmental vulnerability to second-hand smoke exposure, the dangers posed by smoking in confined spaces such as vehicles, and the appropriate measures that should be taken to reduce the risk of harm.

Who thinks what about e‐cigarette regulation? A content analysis of UK newspapers

“…A time‐period of 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2014 was chosen to include the publication of the Scottish Government's Tobacco Control Strategy in March 2013 and the commencement of consultations on e‐cigarette regulation by the UK , Welsh and Scottish Governments in late 2014 . The purposive sampling frame included eight UK and three Scottish national newspapers from the tabloid, middle‐market tabloid and quality genres to ensure that a diverse range of readership profiles was represented . Each publication's Sunday counterpart was included, excluding the Sun on Sunday , which is not archived in the Nexis database.…”

Applying recommended evidence standards to understand the impact of e‐cigarettes on youth smoking and reporting of weak scientific evidence

“…Vapers are being represented increasingly in research, particularly in qualitative analyses which explore experiences of discovering and taking up e-cigarettes [6][7][8][9][10]. While wanting to quit smoking tobacco cigarettes is a common reason reported by vapers when identifying their motives for switching, issues such as cost, health benefits and the ability to use e-cigarettes where tobacco cigarettes are now banned are also primary reasons for trying e-cigarettes [7,9,11] Further, while some vapers report inadvertently stopping smoking altogether, their primary intentions for taking up e-cigarettes include addressing the health or financial aspects of their smoking, rather than wanting to quit altogether [7]. Exploring ethnographically how current vapers use e-cigarettes, as well as intended or unintended reductions in smoked tobacco, should be considered their own form of valid evidence that provides unique insights into tobacco harm reduction that the current RCT evidence may not be able to address.…”

“…In the interim, weak evidence may be the best evidence available. In such a controversial field, with a high degree of media interest [8], and given media influences on public understandings [9], researchers need to delicately balance what we know against what we do not yet know. For example, Villanti et al's conclusion that 'e-cigarettes can help with smoking cessation or reduction' [1] needs to be tempered against their conclusion that only a small proportion of studies (four of the 91 reviewed) met their quality standards to support such a statement.…”

30+ years of media analysis of relevance to chronic disease: a scoping review

“…[26][27][28][29]) or the framing of arguments around smoking restrictions (e.g. [30][31][32][33][34][35]), and to date, no comprehensive synthesis or mapping of the area as a whole exists.…”