2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/aina.2016.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NEXT-FIT: Available Bandwidth Measurement over 4G/LTE Networks -- A Curve-Fitting Approach

Abstract: Available bandwidth (ABW) estimation in wireless networks is a critical issue for quality-of-service (QoS) provisioning. Nowadays, a network path often contains at least one wireless link e.g., mobile users having wireless connection to the Internet through laptop PCs or smartphones. Most of the existing tools for measuring ABW have been developed and evaluated in wired networks. Since the characteristics of wired links and wireless links differ in many respects, such as fluctuations in capacity and stability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, (Shiobara & Okamawari, 2017) evaluates a new estimation method called "TPG" that use a Train of Packet Groups as a probe of the av_bw estimation; this method (TPG) is implemented and evaluated by using a commercial FDD-LTE (frequency division duplex long term evolution) system. On the other hand (Paul, Tachibana, & Hasegawa, 2016) introduces a new Enhanced Available Bandwidth Estimation Technique (NEXT) by introducing a parameterindependent curve-fitting technique to detect the av_bw estimation toolsfrom a one-way queuing delay signature; and it was evaluated on a real test over a radio interface in a 4G/LTE mobile communication network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, (Shiobara & Okamawari, 2017) evaluates a new estimation method called "TPG" that use a Train of Packet Groups as a probe of the av_bw estimation; this method (TPG) is implemented and evaluated by using a commercial FDD-LTE (frequency division duplex long term evolution) system. On the other hand (Paul, Tachibana, & Hasegawa, 2016) introduces a new Enhanced Available Bandwidth Estimation Technique (NEXT) by introducing a parameterindependent curve-fitting technique to detect the av_bw estimation toolsfrom a one-way queuing delay signature; and it was evaluated on a real test over a radio interface in a 4G/LTE mobile communication network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the studies do not show a real analysis of the effects that cause the performance of the traffic flow in a network infrastructure with wireless trunk segments; such as, the real capacity of the link, lost packets, latency, av_bw, among others; because they only focus on evaluating the av_bw estimation tools in wireless network infrastructures based on IEEE 802.11, and 4G/LTE architectures, among others (Abolfazli, Sanaei, Wong, Tabassi, & Rosen, 2015), (Paul, Tachibana, & Hasegawa, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies such as [30], [10], [31], [32], [33], [9], [34], [35], [36], [20], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], concentrate on analyzing the techniques developed, because each author, based on one of the two approaches, creates a technique to optimize the variables of the av_bw metric, such as estimation time, prediction, and relative error. When developing a technique, it is implemented, evaluated and compared with studies such as [42], [11], [12], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [22], [48], [20], [49], [16], [50], [51], [13], [52], [53], [54], [55], show the comparative performance between two or more tools evaluated in simulated environments such as using NS-2 or NS-3, and in real network testbed Evaluate protocols, control certain network parameters, see Table 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, also they evaluated ABET Wireless or hybrid scenarios. In [62], evaluate the NEXT-FIT tool and compared with PathCrip, performance analyzing error and relation between CT and av_bw estimated by both tools. There are other studies that evaluate and compare tools in these scenarios, whose information can be extended in [37], [47], [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%