“…Although GRACE and GRACE‐FO are capable of retrieving the mass transport on the Earth's surface with high temporal resolution (∼30 days, monthly solutions) and spatial resolution (∼300 km × 300 km), they still have some shortcomings, for example, the north‐south stripes (Swenson & Wahr, 2006), the signal distortion and leakage (Kusche et al., 2009), especially at the areas close to the sea‐land boundary. Up to date, more efforts are made to propose novel concepts of future satellite gravity missions with more advanced constellations to derive mass transport with high spatiotemporal resolution, that is, the Next Generation Gravity Mission (e.g., Pail et al., 2018; NG2 Team, 2011), the Earth System Mass Transport Mission (e.motion) (Panet et al., 2013), e 2 .motion (Gruber et al., 2014), the GRadiométrie à Interféromètres quantiques Corrélés pour l'Espace (GRICE) mission (Leveque et al., 2018), a mass variation observing system by high‐low inter‐satellite links (MOBILE) mission (Hauk & Pail, 2019), a Satellite Mission Concept Using Cold Atom Interferometry for Measuring the Earth Gravity Field (MOCASS) mission (Migliaccio et al., 2019), an ICARUS (International Cooperation for Animal Research Using Space) payload system on a future polar‐orbiting GRACE‐like (GRACE‐I) mission (Flechtner, 2020), the GRAvity observations by Vertical Laser ranging (GRAVL) mission (Woodwark et al., 2020), the Mass And Reference Variations for Earth Lookout mission (Lemoine & Mandea, 2020), the Mass‐change and geosciences International Constellation (MAGIC) mission (Svehla, 2021), the Mass Change Designated Observable (MCDO) Study (Wiese et al., 2022), and so on. Of all the aforementioned studies for future gravity satellite missions mentioned above, the GRACE‐I and MAGIC missions are ongoing phase A studies, and MCDO is in the pre‐formulation phase, which has a tentative launch date.…”