International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2014 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2304232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-generation laser retroreflectors for GNSS, solar system exploration, geodesy, gravitational physics and earth observation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, the quantum corrections to general relativity values for noncollinear points L 4 and L 5 look encouraging in the case of (κ 1 , κ 2 ) values appropriate to scattering potential, because corrections just below a centimeter are comparable with the purely instrumental, time-of-flight uncertainty of the geodesic positioning techniques based laser-ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. However, the total error budget of satellite/lunar laser ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] varies with the specific application and/or orbit, at the level of millimeter to centimeter. In the first part of our paper, to prepare the ground for future work, we have provided an original synthesis of the Levi-Civita analysis of the problem of motion of N bodies in general relativity, a very difficult problem that was studied, among the others, by Einstein himself with Infeld and Hoffman [17], Fock [18], Levi-Civita [19], Damour, Soffel and Xu [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this respect, the quantum corrections to general relativity values for noncollinear points L 4 and L 5 look encouraging in the case of (κ 1 , κ 2 ) values appropriate to scattering potential, because corrections just below a centimeter are comparable with the purely instrumental, time-of-flight uncertainty of the geodesic positioning techniques based laser-ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. However, the total error budget of satellite/lunar laser ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] varies with the specific application and/or orbit, at the level of millimeter to centimeter. In the first part of our paper, to prepare the ground for future work, we have provided an original synthesis of the Levi-Civita analysis of the problem of motion of N bodies in general relativity, a very difficult problem that was studied, among the others, by Einstein himself with Infeld and Hoffman [17], Fock [18], Levi-Civita [19], Damour, Soffel and Xu [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new map (5.14) is such that the quantum corrected Lagrangian reads as [19,26,27], while 3 sets of quantum parameters κ 1 and κ 2 are conceivable in effective gravity [5,6,[11][12][13]. In this respect, the quantum corrections to general relativity values for noncollinear points L 4 and L 5 look encouraging in the case of (κ 1 , κ 2 ) values appropriate to scattering potential, because corrections just below a centimeter are comparable with the purely instrumental, time-of-flight uncertainty of the geodesic positioning techniques based laser-ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. However, the total error budget of satellite/lunar laser ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] varies with the specific application and/or orbit, at the level of millimeter to centimeter.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation