Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2015.tu2e.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-Generation Optical Access Networks for C-RAN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, simulations show that this scheme is robust against laser phase noise, which may allow for the use of cost-effective large-linewidth lasers. The scheme can be applied to access scenarios in which symmetric and high-speed data delivery might be preferred, e. g., point-to-point WDM-PON overlay for demanding applications including next-generation mobile backhaul, mobile fronthaul and business applications [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, simulations show that this scheme is robust against laser phase noise, which may allow for the use of cost-effective large-linewidth lasers. The scheme can be applied to access scenarios in which symmetric and high-speed data delivery might be preferred, e. g., point-to-point WDM-PON overlay for demanding applications including next-generation mobile backhaul, mobile fronthaul and business applications [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9), a type of DRoF-based transmission interface, such as CPRI, is employed. The optical data rate of an MFH network must be approximately 16 times as high as the wireless data rate of the mobile cells [16], whereas regarding the MBH network the optical data rate is expected to be almost the same as the wireless data rate of the mobile cells. On the other hand, in future 5G mobile networks, the introduction of small cells operating at wireless data rates higher than 1 Gb/s is expected, and small cells will be densely deployed in high-traffic areas.…”
Section: Mobile Fronthaul Transmission Interface Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is data compression of the conventional DRoF-based signal (MFH-IF (b)). The optical data rate of MFH networks can be suppressed approximately 50% by down sampling and non-linear quantizing [16]. Another approach redefines the functional allocation of the BBU/RRH (MFH-IF (c)) [17]; the transmission interface is not based on a DRoF interface, but on packets, by setting a functional split point between the BBU and RRH near the MAC functional layer.…”
Section: Mobile Fronthaul Transmission Interface Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, high-level coordinations can be realized through technologies such as enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) and coordinated multi-point (CoMP) transmission and reception [3]. To connect the fronthaul link between BBU and RRH, current C-RAN mainly employs Common Public Radio Interface (CPRI), which is based on digital transmission of quantized waveforms of in-phase and quadrature (IQ) signals [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%