2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.202701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-to-Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Pressure of Cold Quark Matter: Leading Logarithm

Abstract: At high baryon chemical potential µB, the equation of state of QCD allows a weak-coupling expansion in the QCD coupling αs. The result is currently known up to and including the full next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) α 2 s . Starting at this order, the computations are complicated by the modification of particle propagation in a dense medium, which necessitates non-perturbative treatment of the scale α 1/2 s µB. In this work, we apply a Hard-Thermal-Loop scheme for capturing the contributions of this scale … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
135
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…p p SB µ B →∞ = p p SB T →∞ = α SB . The present assumption is supported by the consistency of lattice data on the QCD EoS for 2, 2+1 and 3 quark flavours [5] and O(α 2 s ) perturbative calculations at zero temperature [53]. In both of these cases α SB = 0.8 within estimated error bars.…”
Section: Density Dependent Polyakov Loop Potentialsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…p p SB µ B →∞ = p p SB T →∞ = α SB . The present assumption is supported by the consistency of lattice data on the QCD EoS for 2, 2+1 and 3 quark flavours [5] and O(α 2 s ) perturbative calculations at zero temperature [53]. In both of these cases α SB = 0.8 within estimated error bars.…”
Section: Density Dependent Polyakov Loop Potentialsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…p ∼ n 2 B at n B → ∞. This leads to p ∼ µ 2 B being inconsistent with results of perturbative QCD p ∼ µ 4 B [53,60]. We, however, may think on NJL-inspired models as a low energy approximation which should not necessarily reproduce the high density behaviour of QCD.…”
Section: Equation Of Statementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Note carefully that in order to compare with Ref. [16] in the present work we will investigate the case of vanishing current masses (m u = m d = m s = 0), while m in Eq. (3.2) above will become our variational mass upon implementing the RGOPT replacements, just as in the GN case illustrated in the previous section II.…”
Section: Rgopt Evaluation Of the Qcd Quark Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare with the results given in Refs. [13,16] we will consider the scale variation µ ≤ M ≤ 4µ besides the "central" scale M = 2µ. The exact two-loop (2L) running coupling, analogue of the one-loop Eq.…”
Section: B Nlo Two-loop (δ 1 ) Rgopt: In-medium Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been significant progress in the estimate for ∼ n 0 , but we need extrapolations to the domain relevant for NS, introducing significant errors for 2n 0 . These constraints for the M-R curves have been considerably improved by the discovery of the NS merger event GW170817, found in Aug. 17,2017. The total mass is M GW 170817 = 2.73-2.78M and it is plausible to have the mass ratio M 1 /M 2 of 0.7-1.0 with which M 1,2 1.3-1.4M .…”
Section: The Neutron Star Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%