2017
DOI: 10.1111/irfi.12169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nexus between Institutional Quality and Capital Inflows at Different Stages of Economic Development

Abstract: We examine the determinants of capital inflows for a global sample of countries at various stages of economic development, namely factor‐, efficiency‐, and innovation‐driven stages. We investigate the effect of institutional quality on capital inflows. The magnitude of institutional quality effect depends on the stage of economic development. Both public and private institutional qualities positively affect capital inflows in efficiency‐ and innovation‐driven countries. Specifically, corporate ethics and accou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the findings recommend that policymakers and regulatory bodies should be paid more attention to the drivers of REN specifically economic openness. Based on previous studies' suggestions (e.g., Athari & Adaoglu, 2019; Athari et al, 2020), policymakers and regulatory bodies to attract cross‐border capital inflows should be improved the global competitiveness of their environments by enhancing pillars such as institution quality, infrastructure macroeconomic environment, goods and labor market efficiency, and market size. Environments with higher global competitiveness rankings could benefit by enormous inflowing cross‐border capital such as FDI, which could help finance renewable energy projects and eventually increase REN.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the findings recommend that policymakers and regulatory bodies should be paid more attention to the drivers of REN specifically economic openness. Based on previous studies' suggestions (e.g., Athari & Adaoglu, 2019; Athari et al, 2020), policymakers and regulatory bodies to attract cross‐border capital inflows should be improved the global competitiveness of their environments by enhancing pillars such as institution quality, infrastructure macroeconomic environment, goods and labor market efficiency, and market size. Environments with higher global competitiveness rankings could benefit by enormous inflowing cross‐border capital such as FDI, which could help finance renewable energy projects and eventually increase REN.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research conducted by Kim et al (2018) pointed out the role of regional vs. global savings in financing domestic investment, leading to increased international capital flows from 1980 to 2014 in 141 nations worldwide. Likewise, Athari and Adaoglu (2019) explored the various determinants of capital inflows for a sample of 135 countries across the globe at different stages of economic development, emphasizing the role of institutional quality, accountability, and corporate ethics. In another study, Athari et al (2020) investigated the role of a country's competitiveness on the cross-border flow of capital by using the global competitiveness index at different stages of economic development from 2006-2014 for 133 countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the enterprise enters a host country with a higher institutional quality than the home country, it can formulate effective acquisition strategies by anticipating relevant issues in the acquisition process [30]. The institutional quality has a certain degree of impact on the capital inflow, and the magnitude of the institutional quality effect depends on the stage of economic development [31]. Furthermore, enterprise innovation will be affected by institutional differences and the OFDI mode choice [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%