2012
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ngLOC: software and web server for predicting protein subcellular localization in prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Abstract: BackgroundUnderstanding protein subcellular localization is a necessary component toward understanding the overall function of a protein. Numerous computational methods have been published over the past decade, with varying degrees of success. Despite the large number of published methods in this area, only a small fraction of them are available for researchers to use in their own studies. Of those that are available, many are limited by predicting only a small number of organelles in the cell. Additionally, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose (i) TargetP (Emanuelsson et al, 2000) the predictor uses a combination of neural networks to calculate a transit or SP score, and a weight matrix to locate the transit peptide cleavage sites; (ii) Mitoprot (Claros and Vincens, 1996) a feature-based method, uses a linear combination of a number of sequence characteristics such as amino-acid abundance, maximum hydrophobicity and maximum hydrophobic moment (α-helix amphiphilicity); (iii) Predotar (Small et al, 2004) the neural networkbased approach; (iv) PSORT II (Nakai and Horton, 1999) which is based on the k-nearest-neighbour method; (v) MultiLoc (Höglund et al, 2006) a support vector machine (SVM)-based approach for predicting subcellular localization, which integrates N-terminal targeting sequences, amino acid composition and protein sequence motifs; (vi) ngLOC (King et al, 2012) which is an ngram-based Bayesian classifier; (vii) YLoc (Briesemeister et al, 2010) is an interpretable web server for predicting subcellular localization which also uses GO term features; (viii) CELLO (Yu et al, 2006) is based on the multiple feature vector coding schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We chose (i) TargetP (Emanuelsson et al, 2000) the predictor uses a combination of neural networks to calculate a transit or SP score, and a weight matrix to locate the transit peptide cleavage sites; (ii) Mitoprot (Claros and Vincens, 1996) a feature-based method, uses a linear combination of a number of sequence characteristics such as amino-acid abundance, maximum hydrophobicity and maximum hydrophobic moment (α-helix amphiphilicity); (iii) Predotar (Small et al, 2004) the neural networkbased approach; (iv) PSORT II (Nakai and Horton, 1999) which is based on the k-nearest-neighbour method; (v) MultiLoc (Höglund et al, 2006) a support vector machine (SVM)-based approach for predicting subcellular localization, which integrates N-terminal targeting sequences, amino acid composition and protein sequence motifs; (vi) ngLOC (King et al, 2012) which is an ngram-based Bayesian classifier; (vii) YLoc (Briesemeister et al, 2010) is an interpretable web server for predicting subcellular localization which also uses GO term features; (viii) CELLO (Yu et al, 2006) is based on the multiple feature vector coding schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target P: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/ (Emanuelsson et al, 2000) Mitoprot II: http://ihg.gsf.de/ihg/mitoprot.html (Claros and Vincens, 1996) Predotar: https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/predotar/predotar.html (Small et al, 2004) Psort II: http://psort.hgc.jp/form2.html (Nakai and Horton, 1999) MultiLoc/TargetLoc: http://abi.inf.uni-tuebingen.de/Services/ MultiLoc/ (Höglund et al, 2006) ngLOC: http://genome.unmc.edu/ngLOC/index.html (King et al, 2012) YLoc: http://abi.inf.uni-tuebingen.de/Services/YLoc/webloc.cgi (Briesemeister et al, 2010) CELLO v2.5: http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/ (Yu et al, 2006) The analyses were done in March and April of 2014 for Tables 2 and 3 and in August of 2014 for Table 1. All the results were confirmed in August of 2014.…”
Section: Prediction Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NCBI blast server (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was used for similarity analysis with other sequences in the database. The localization of the protein within the cell was predicted using pSORT (http://wolfpsort.org/), CELLO v.2.5 (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/), TargetP_v1, PredSL, ngLOC and ProtComp (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml) servers (Emanuelsson et al, 2000; Petsalaki et al, 2006; Yu et al, 2006; Horton et al, 2007; King et al, 2012). Occurrence of signal peptide was recognized using SignalP 4.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus beyond the localization of GPX4 the localization of the GSH transporter protein SLC25A11 (2-oxoglutarate carrier:OGC) was also investigated by the aforementioned prediction tools. The prediction tool ngLOC that also uses gene ontology analysis [31] gave high mitochondrial localization score and other three prediction tools (TargetP, MitoProt and CELLO) give moderate scores (Table 4). PSORT II gave a low probability while Predotar and iPSORT practically gave no probability of the mitochondrial localization of SLC25A11 (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%