2022
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202102614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ni‐Fe Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets Supported on Exfoliated Graphite for Efficient Urea Oxidation in Direct Urea Fuel Cells

Abstract: Urea-rich wastewater can cause serious eutrophication problem to the water environment. On the other hand, urea is a potential fuel with high energy density, which can be effectively utilized by direct urea fuel cell. In this work, exfoliated graphite (EG) with high surface area and electrical conductivity was obtained by microwave irradiation, which was used to support the NiÀ Fe layered double hydroxide (LDH), leading to a highly efficient and low-cost urea oxidation catalyst. Compared with commercial RuO 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Fe 2p spectrum, there are two major spin–orbital peaks at the binding energies of 723.5 eV and 710.5 eV, which are assigned to Fe 3+ 2p 1/2 and 2p 3/2 orbitals, respectively. 39 Another peak located at 716.0 eV is associated with the satellite peak. 27 As for the Ni 2p spectrum, the two peaks at 873.2 eV and 855.4 eV are assigned to Ni 2+ 2p 1/2 and 2p 3/2 orbitals, accompanied by two shake-up satellite peaks at 879.1 eV and 860.8 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Fe 2p spectrum, there are two major spin–orbital peaks at the binding energies of 723.5 eV and 710.5 eV, which are assigned to Fe 3+ 2p 1/2 and 2p 3/2 orbitals, respectively. 39 Another peak located at 716.0 eV is associated with the satellite peak. 27 As for the Ni 2p spectrum, the two peaks at 873.2 eV and 855.4 eV are assigned to Ni 2+ 2p 1/2 and 2p 3/2 orbitals, accompanied by two shake-up satellite peaks at 879.1 eV and 860.8 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[79] This limitation further impacts the overall energy density of the DUFC because it is notably greater compared to the oxidation potential of urea (À 0.46 V vs SHE). Therefore, to create more efficient UOR system, the modification of single nickel metals with another transition metal, such as Cr, [64] Mo, [65,80] Mn, [65,68] Fe, [81] Co, [27,67,[82][83][84] Cu, [78] Zn, [46] Sn, [85] Bi, [69] W, [86] and Pd, [87] has been reported to successfully overcome this limitations. These bimetallic Ni-based catalysts are predominantly synthesized using simple methods, such as hydrothermal or chemical deposition techniques.…”
Section: Combining Ni With Other Metalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are still many interesting Ni-metal combinations that have potency to be developed for DUFC, as demonstrated by their UOR activities. For instance, layered double hydroxide Ni-Fe [81] was modified with exfoliated graphite as a carbon-based material via microwave irradiation techniques, resulting in a lower onset potential of 1.25 V vs. RHE and a reduced Tafel slope of 44 mV dec À 1 . Furthermore, the decoration process of Ni-Mn with carbon nanofibrous [89] produce an excellent current density of 120 mA cm À 2 g À 1 with an onset potential of 290 mV (vs. Ag/ AgCl) in urea oxidation.…”
Section: Combining Ni With Other Metalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoFeCr-LDHs 0.33 M urea 1.305 10 85 [129] NiMoV-LDHs 0.33 M urea 1.40 100 24.29 [130] FQD/CoNi-LDHs 0.5 M urea 1.36 10 17 [131] NiMn-LDHs 0.5 M urea 1.351 20 38.9 [133] NiCo-LDHs 0.33 M urea 1.36 50 45 [134] pa-NiFe-LDHs NS 0.33 M urea 1.362 30 33 [135] Cu-Ni3S2@NiFe-LDHs-200 0.5 M urea 1.319 100 37.78 [136] NiFe-LDHs-F-4 0.33 M urea 1.44 50 31 [137] NiAl-LDHs 0.33 M urea 1.42 10 59.8 [30] CoNi-LDHs-3 0.33 M urea 1.39 100 16 [138] NiFe-LDHs/EG 0.33 M urea 1.34 50 44 [139] Ce(OH)3@NiFe-LDHs 0.5 M urea 1.40 10 30.3 [140] H-NiFe-LDHs 0.33 M urea 1.397 10 41.7 [141] MoS2/Ni3S2/NiFe-LDHs 0.5 M urea 1.396 100 36 [142] NiCo-LDHs-[MoS4] 2− 0.33 M urea 1.34 10 29 [143] CoMn-LDHs 0.33 M urea 1.326 10 73 [144]…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%