Ni qué hablar/ni qué decir, ¿construcciones u operadores escalares?

Rodríguez, Catalina Fuentes

doi:10.25267/pragmalinguistica.2021.i29.08

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are intermediate stages in this process of constructionalization. This has been illustrated for specific items before (Fuentes Rodríguez 2014Rodríguez , 2020aRodríguez , 2021aRodríguez , 2021bRodríguez , 2022b and will be tested for no veas in this paper. The form no veas has also been observed to undergo the abovementioned fixation process and has passed through three stages, the second of which is the object of our study:…”

Section: Constructionalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Peripheral Structure to Discourse Operator: No Veas

Fuentes Rodríguez

2023

Languages

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work describes the cooptation/grammaticalization process developed by the expression no veas. The hypothesis it defends, endorsed by previous research, considers that in this process, this expression appears in different constructions, originally integrated in the clause or peripheral, and is involved in a process of fixation towards pragmatic markers. The parenthetical distribution is fundamental to this subjectification and constructionalizationss. In some cases, the cooptation process has not ended, and constructions can act as semi-fixed patterns. These constructions provide procedural content but, at the same time, allow lexical choice in part of their structure. In other cases, we are already dealing with fixed markers. The Spanish structure no veas can appear as a free verbal construction (“No veas tanto la televisión” (don’t watch television so much)), as a semi-free intensification construction (“no veas lo enfadado que está” (you wouldn’t believe how angry he is), “está gritando que no veas” (he’s shouting like you wouldn’t believe)), or as a discourse operator (“El campo está lleno, no veas” (the stadium’s full, unbelievable)). In the latter case, the structure appears peripheral and displays a high degree of mobility (it could be inserted at the beginning of the utterance or appear in an intermediate position, not just at the end) and functions as a modal operator of surprise (a mirative) or a comment with intensifying meaning.

show abstract

Section: Constructionalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Peripheral Structure to Discourse Operator: No Veas

Fuentes Rodríguez

2023

Languages

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Relaciones de preparación

Fuentes Rodríguez

2024

Círc. lingüíst. apl. comun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En esta investigación se tratan las relaciones discursivas que abren un discurso. Utilizando un enfoque macrosintáctico y una perspectiva de Lingüística pragmática, se diferencian las relaciones de apertura de texto, párrafo o enunciado, propiamente de estructuración textual, de las de preparación en estos mismos niveles. Estas últimas, en las que se centra el estudio, son metadiscursivas. Anuncian el desarrollo posterior del enunciado, párrafo o texto, apuntando a las relaciones enunciativas, modales, informativas o argumentativas, y son determinantes para garantizar la coherencia textual.

show abstract

Ni qué hablar/ni qué decir, ¿construcciones u operadores escalares?

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

From Peripheral Structure to Discourse Operator: No Veas

From Peripheral Structure to Discourse Operator: No Veas

Relaciones de preparación

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About