2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nice or smart? Task relevance of self-characteristics moderates interpersonal projection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, one might argue that when anticipating cooperating with others, people project differentially as a function of what aspects of the self they deem relevant in a given situation. Indeed, this is what we found in a set of two studies in which we investigated the impact of trait relevance for a specific task on people's projection of their characteristics onto a cooperative partner (Toma, Yzerbyt, & Corneille, 2012). In cooperative situations, participants projected more on task-relevant traits than on task-irrelevant traits.…”
Section: Why Do People Project In Social Dilemmas?supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Nonetheless, one might argue that when anticipating cooperating with others, people project differentially as a function of what aspects of the self they deem relevant in a given situation. Indeed, this is what we found in a set of two studies in which we investigated the impact of trait relevance for a specific task on people's projection of their characteristics onto a cooperative partner (Toma, Yzerbyt, & Corneille, 2012). In cooperative situations, participants projected more on task-relevant traits than on task-irrelevant traits.…”
Section: Why Do People Project In Social Dilemmas?supporting
confidence: 64%
“…To control their self-perceived competence, all participants were told that they had scored slightly above the average (allegedlly calculated on a large population aged between 18 and 30 years). They were then asked to pick five prefered activities from a list of 20 (Toma, Yzerbyt, & Corneille, 2012). The purpose of these two tasks (Raven task and choice of activities) was to increase the credibility of the information provided to participants about the target in subsequent steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These traits became salient probably because low- and high-power people learn through experience that in some social interactions or for some specific tasks, some traits are more important than others. A study by Toma, Yzerbyt, and Corneille (2012) showed that people project more competence than warmth when the task requires intelligence, but more warmth than competence when the task requires sociability. Given that social projection is conceptualized as a cognitive tool (Krueger & Clement, 1994) but also as a motivational mechanism (Toma & Woltin, 2012), the salience of traits is not incompatible with a more motivational explanation for the effect of power on social projection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%