Competition for food and negative interspecific sexual interactions (reproductive interference) have been identified as major drivers of species exclusion. These interactions likely do not act independently, as they often involve the same actors and may be modulated by the same underlying traits. However, how they determine competitive dominance when acting in combination has not yet been studied. Here, we address this issue using two closely related species, the spider mitesTetranychus urticaeandT. cinnabarinus. First, by measuring species interactions in small-scale experiments, we revealed that the strength and symmetry of reproductive interference between species changed in presence of food competition. Next, using a population model, we showed that such non-additive effects induce significant changes in predicted competitive outcomes, specifically, a change in priority effects from favouring the inferior competitor for food in the sole presence of reproductive interference to favouring the superior competitor instead. Finally, we confirmed the accuracy of the model predictions for short-term population dynamics in a large-scale experiment. Together, these lines of evidence show that food competition and reproductive interference have non-additive effects on the population dynamics of interacting species, and highlight the necessity of incorporating both mechanisms to better predict competitive outcomes.