Niche Relationships Among Six Species of Shorebirds on Their Wintering and Breeding Ranges

Abstract

The dynamics of the organization of a community of six species of migrant predatory shorebirds (Least Sandpiper, Semipalmated Sandpiper, Dunlin, Short—billed Dowitcher, Lesser Yellowlegs, and Semipalmated Plover) was appraised by studying foraging behavior and habitat utilization under winter conditions in southern Florida and under summer conditions in the eastern Canadian Arctic. Eight foraging methods, defined primarily on the basis of how the bill is used and the pattern of locomotion, constitute the behavioral repertoire of the species. Each foraging method is correlated with a particular rate of locomotion (distance/time) and rate of feeding (pecking or probing/time). Feeding and locomotion rates seem independent of air temperature, number of conspecifics, and total number of shorebirds foraging nearby. Instead, the seasonal changes in these rates are probably related to food density. On the basis of these findings and of differences in rates of feeding and locomotion between species the most reasonable hypothesis is that food density is higher in summer on the breeding grounds and foraging is more selective. Each foraging method is combination with a particular microhabitat defines a statistically different resource. During the winter, on intertidal habitats of southern Florida, shorebirds on the whole exhibit a low behavioral and microhabitat diversity and low resource overlap between species. The small niche breadth in winter is probably a response to food limitation, and each species exists in its exclusive niche where it is optimally adapted and therefore has high foraging efficiency. In summer tundra and taiga habitats of the Arctic, shorebirds generally have a higher behavioral and microhabitat diversity (broader niche) and higher overlap between species. Exceptions to these general patterns exist among the study species. Seasonal differences in prey density, prey behavior, time available for foraging, feeding and locomotion rates, and the pattern of resource partitioning imply that shorebird populations are regulated through competitive processes occurring on their wintering habitats. Conclusions concerning coexistence mechanisms in migratory bird species and residents in seasonal environments may be erroneous if populations are studied only in the breeding season.

Foraging mode shift in varying environmental conditions by dunlin Calidris alpina

“…Empirically, foraging mode shifts have been studied in relation to varying prey availability induced, variously, by prey size (Helfman & Winkelman 1991), seasonality (Baker & Baker 1973, Lister & Aguayo 1992, temperature (Nebel & Thompson 2005), microhabitats (Fausch et al 1997), and tidal cycles . Also, environmental (abiotic) conditions other than prey availability may induce foraging mode shifts.…”

“…1) on a sandflat in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Dunlin are ideal organisms for testing mode choice and shifts, because, compared to other shorebird species, they show greater flexibility in foraging modes in response to environmental changes (Baker & Baker 1973). Using a digital camcorder with a telescopic lens, we measured foraging action rate, capture rate, and intake rate of dunlin throughout tidal emersion periods to test 2 hypotheses: (1) individuals that attain higher capture and/or intake rates by one of 2 modes allocate proportionately greater foraging effort to the successful mode, and (2) the birds shift their foraging mode in response to changing prey availability and sediment penetrability driven by the tidal cycle.…”

An overview of wetlands of Saudi Arabia: Values, threats, and perspectives

“…These large expanses of highly bio-productive mudflats are used by millions of waders for migration refueling and roosting (Wolff 1969;Baker and Baker 1973). Over the past decades, Saudi Arabia, like other Gulf countries, has experienced extensive coastal development leading to the disappearance of coastal ecosystems ( Fig.…”

Co-occurrence and aggregation of marine birds and mammals in Monterey Bay, California, USA

“…When prey is less abundant, competition is greater, and increased segregation may ameliorate this competition (Baker & Baker 1973, Pianka 1974, DuBowy 1988, Ainley & Boekelheide 1990. However, there were more positive associations among surface-feeders and between guilds in 2000.…”