2020 7th International Conference on Soft Computing &Amp; Machine Intelligence (ISCMI) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iscmi51676.2020.9311551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NichePSO and the Merging Subswarm Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a particle or a sub-swarm moves within the radius of another sub-swarm, it is absorbed by the latter. Despite its performance, NichePSO has been shown to lose its diversity over time because all sub-swarms may eventually fuse into a single large swarm [10]. In contrast, comparing NichePSO, our proposed method top-k PSO retains the communication network within the swarm, which enables enhanced exploration of the environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If a particle or a sub-swarm moves within the radius of another sub-swarm, it is absorbed by the latter. Despite its performance, NichePSO has been shown to lose its diversity over time because all sub-swarms may eventually fuse into a single large swarm [10]. In contrast, comparing NichePSO, our proposed method top-k PSO retains the communication network within the swarm, which enables enhanced exploration of the environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…NichePSO could identify the first peak with similar probability compared top-k PSO, but due to the long simulation time, the sub-swarms of NichePSO exhibited a high probability of coalescing, causing the swarm to lose multiple tracked op-tima [10], and making the behavior of the swarm closer to that of the canonical PSO. In multi-modal problems such as in our case, this phenomenon is problematic, as shown in Tables 2 to 4, where NichePSO performed worse than both baseline methods when identifying second and subsequent peaks.…”
Section: Static Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation