Niches, models, and climate change: Assessing the assumptions and uncertainties

Abstract

As the rate and magnitude of climate change accelerate, understanding the consequences becomes increasingly important. Species distribution models (SDMs) based on current ecological niche constraints are used to project future species distributions. These models contain assumptions that add to the uncertainty in model projections stemming from the structure of the models, the algorithms used to translate niche associations into distributional probabilities, the quality and quantity of data, and mismatches between the scales of modeling and data. We illustrate the application of SDMs using two climate models and two distributional algorithms, together with information on distributional shifts in vegetation types, to project fine-scale future distributions of 60 California landbird species. Most species are projected to decrease in distribution by 2070. Changes in total species richness vary over the state, with large losses of species in some ''hotspots'' of vulnerability. Differences in distributional shifts among species will change species co-occurrences, creating spatial variation in similarities between current and future assemblages. We use these analyses to consider how assumptions can be addressed and uncertainties reduced. SDMs can provide a useful way to incorporate future conditions into conservation and management practices and decisions, but the uncertainties of model projections must be balanced with the risks of taking the wrong actions or the costs of inaction. Doing this will require that the sources and magnitudes of uncertainty are documented, and that conservationists and resource managers be willing to act despite the uncertainties. The alternative, of ignoring the future, is not an option.birds ͉ California ͉ ecological niche ͉ species distribution models ͉ conservation

Modeling Adaptive and Nonadaptive Responses of Populations to Environmental Change

“…Understanding and predicting these responses is one of the most pressing issues currently facing humanity. For this reason, in the past quarter century, there has been considerable interest in developing ways to understand how the natural world will be affected by environmental change (Ives 1995;Bossdorf et al 2008;Gilbert and Epel 2009;Wiens et al 2009;Lavergne et al 2010;Dawson et al 2011;Hoffmann and Sgrò 2011). We introduce a new general approach combining insights from structured population modeling and evolutionary genetics that allows us to examine how adaptive evolution and plasticity contribute to the way that populations-and, consequently, the ecosystems in which they are embedded-respond to environmental change.…”

Modeling climate change impacts on tidal marsh birds: Restoration and conservation planning in the face of uncertainty

“…However, the future conditions which were used as inputs into our distribution models do not represent novel conditions for the tidal marsh bird species we studied. Species distribution models also rely upon other assumptions that are frequently violated (Wiens et al 2009). For example, the tolerances of species are assumed to be represented by their spatial distributions and these tolerances are also assumed to remain unchanged into the future.…”

Orchids distribution and bioclimatic niches as a strategy to climate change in areas of tropical dry forest in Colombia

“…For modelling, the potential niche or habitat idoneity is understood as the n-dimensional area where the species encounters the conditions that allow its survival and reproduction (Wiens et al 2009). A total, 19 variables correspond to bioclimatic parameters associated with the baseline annual temperature and precipitation characteristics (Hijmans et al 2005) were selected.…”