2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11243-021-00478-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nickel(II) complexes with mono(imino)pyrrole ligands: preparation, structure, DFT calculation and catalytic behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the Cu1−N3 (2.011 Å) bond is shorter than the Cu1−N1 (2.052 Å) bond (Table S2), suggesting that N3 may have stronger σ‐donor properties induced by the methyl group (C13). [25] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the Cu1−N3 (2.011 Å) bond is shorter than the Cu1−N1 (2.052 Å) bond (Table S2), suggesting that N3 may have stronger σ‐donor properties induced by the methyl group (C13). [25] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] Notably, the Cu1À N3 (2.011 Å) bond is shorter than the Cu1À N1 (2.052 Å) bond (Table S2), suggesting that N3 may have stronger σ-donor properties induced by the methyl group (C13). [25] In addition, single crystals of 2 a, 4 a and 5 a suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow diffusion of ether into DMF solutions of [Ni(L1)], [Co(L2)] and [Ni(L2)] complexes, respectively. Complexes 2 a, 4 a, and 5 a are all mononuclear mono-ligand structures formed by the reaction of ligands and metal salts in a 1 : 1 ratio.…”
Section: Molecular Structures Of L1 L2 and 1 2 A 3 4 4 A 5 Amentioning
confidence: 99%