2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nickel incorporated graphitic carbon nitride supported copper sulfide for efficient noble-metal-free photo-electrochemical water splitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Nyquist plots, the semicircle diameter is used as an indicator of the electron-transfer resistance on an electrode surface. Smaller and larger semicircles reflect lower and higher charge transfer resistances, which imply faster and slower charge transfer at the electrode/electrolyte interface, respectively. , The FeS 2 /TiO 2 electrode has a smaller semicircle than Ann.FeS 2 and NonAnn.FeS 2 electrodes, i.e., it can effectively enhance charge transfer from the electrode surface to the electrolyte. , The thin (∼72 nm) and porous TiO 2 layer may allow charge transfer from the electrode surface to the electrolyte. , Significantly, the TiO 2 thin layer inhibited the weathering process, which agrees with the previous results of the present study. Remarkably, the FeS 2 /TiO 2 electrode displayed enhanced conductivity with a lower charge transfer resistance and fast kinetics.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Nyquist plots, the semicircle diameter is used as an indicator of the electron-transfer resistance on an electrode surface. Smaller and larger semicircles reflect lower and higher charge transfer resistances, which imply faster and slower charge transfer at the electrode/electrolyte interface, respectively. , The FeS 2 /TiO 2 electrode has a smaller semicircle than Ann.FeS 2 and NonAnn.FeS 2 electrodes, i.e., it can effectively enhance charge transfer from the electrode surface to the electrolyte. , The thin (∼72 nm) and porous TiO 2 layer may allow charge transfer from the electrode surface to the electrolyte. , Significantly, the TiO 2 thin layer inhibited the weathering process, which agrees with the previous results of the present study. Remarkably, the FeS 2 /TiO 2 electrode displayed enhanced conductivity with a lower charge transfer resistance and fast kinetics.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Due to the annealing of TiO 2 , it became more crystalline and porous, as observed from the TiO 2 FESEM image (Figure S8). The crystalline grains enhance the electrical conductivity, which is a key characteristic of electrical transport from the electro-adsorbed materials to the catalyst. It is well reported that the Ann.TiO 2 protective layer showed columnar crystallinity, conductivity, and stability and became electronically leaky during the OER process. , Different studies reported similar electronically leaky behavior during the electrochemical reaction with a range of coating thicknesses of the TiO 2 layer. ,, These results indicate that the TiO 2 overlayer could help to display better electrocatalytic durability toward the OER than that we actually noted for FeS 2 /TiO 2 samples studied in the present report. The i – t curve measurements were performed to assess the electrochemical stability of the FeS 2 /TiO 2 catalyst by holding the potential at 1.7 V. Figure e shows that the current density ranges from 2.8 to 6.7 mA/cm 2 in 14 h. The initial current density (2.8 mA/cm 2 ) is increased with time due to the activation process of the FeS 2 /TiO 2 electrode, which produces more active sites on the electrode surface, and then remains stable at 6.7 mA/cm 2 for over 14 h. Consequently, without any surface oxidation, FeS 2 /TiO 2 maintained OER stability (Figure e) for 14 h with a constant current density of 6.7 mA/cm 2 at 1.77 V vs RHE.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11,[54][55] Co doping induced a decrease in the band gap, consequently lowering the charge transfer resistance and facilitating the dynamic kinetics, resulting in excellent HER activity. [56][57] In contrast, Fe doping increased the band gap, inevitably increasing the charge transfer resistance and decreasing the HER activity. The results showed that the band gap variation was in agreement with the results of the activity and EIS measurements, suggesting that the band gap was an essential factor in modifying the HER performance in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this field, the research on photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting (WS) relies on semiconductor electrodes (generally metal oxides) that exhibit appreciable photogenerated charge separation at the solid/liquid interface when illuminated by sunlight [6][7][8][9]. To the best of our knowledge, studies on photoelectrochemical cells were conducted, even recently [10][11][12][13][14], in a liquid electrolyte, thus requiring post-processing energy to separate evolved gas from water splitting. In our recent work, tandem photoelectrochemical cells were constituted by a solid polymeric membrane, acting as both gas separator and electrolyte, sandwiched between a photoanode and a photocathode [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%