2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nickel-Iron nitrides and alloy heterojunction with amorphous N-doped carbon Shell: High-efficiency synergistic electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, (Fe 1 Ni 0 ) 4 N (57 mV dec −1 ), (Fe 0.95 Ni 0.05 ) 4 N (40 mV dec −1 ) and (Fe 0.88 Ni 0.12 ) 4 N (43 mV dec −1 ), which indicated the more favorable reaction kinetics of (Fe 0.90 Ni 0.10 ) 4 N for OER. This overpotential (292 mV) and Tafel slope (29 mV dec −1 ) were also much lower than that for many of the previously reported Fe- or Ni-based compounds (Table S3, ESI†), such as phosphides and nitrides, 1,28,34,36,39 furthermore, it was better than that for the IrO 2 benchmark 28 for OER, which suggested that the (Fe x Ni 1− x ) 4 N NPs were a promising catalyst for OER. A more precise and convenient comparison, for overpotentials at a current density of 10 mA cm −2 and the corresponding Tafel slopes are summarized for different catalysts in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…, (Fe 1 Ni 0 ) 4 N (57 mV dec −1 ), (Fe 0.95 Ni 0.05 ) 4 N (40 mV dec −1 ) and (Fe 0.88 Ni 0.12 ) 4 N (43 mV dec −1 ), which indicated the more favorable reaction kinetics of (Fe 0.90 Ni 0.10 ) 4 N for OER. This overpotential (292 mV) and Tafel slope (29 mV dec −1 ) were also much lower than that for many of the previously reported Fe- or Ni-based compounds (Table S3, ESI†), such as phosphides and nitrides, 1,28,34,36,39 furthermore, it was better than that for the IrO 2 benchmark 28 for OER, which suggested that the (Fe x Ni 1− x ) 4 N NPs were a promising catalyst for OER. A more precise and convenient comparison, for overpotentials at a current density of 10 mA cm −2 and the corresponding Tafel slopes are summarized for different catalysts in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As shown in Fig. 5(b), the superior OER performance of (Fe 0.90 Ni 0.10 ) 4 N was also confirmed by its S3, ESI †), such as phosphides and nitrides, 1,28,34,36,39 furthermore, it was better than that for the IrO 2 benchmark 28 for OER, which suggested that the (Fe x Ni 1Àx ) 4 N NPs were a promising catalyst for OER. A more precise and convenient comparison, for overpotentials at a current density of 10 mA cm À2 and the corresponding Tafel slopes are summarized for different catalysts in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rational design of TMNs’ nanocrystalline-based electrocatalysts can not only notably reduce the consumption of precious metals, but also improve the ionic conductivity of materials by shortening the diffusion length of ions in the electrocatalytic process. Therefore, the design of favorable nanostructures for electrode materials can significantly improve electrocatalytic performance [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. The unique nanostructure will provide new features of the electrocatalytic surface, which can significantly enhance the activity of the electrocatalyst, and lead to a large specific surface area and more adsorption and reaction sites [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%