2006
DOI: 10.1080/10826080500409076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotine and Cognitive Efficiency in Alcoholics and Illicit Stimulant Abusers: Implications of Smoking Cessation for Substance Users in Treatment

Abstract: Cigarette smoking is prevalent among alcoholics and illicit substance abusers. However, the potentially confounding effect of nicotine on studies of cognition in detoxified substance users has rarely been addressed. In the current study of 87 participants, behavioral and electrophysiological indices of cognitive efficiency were measured in tobacco smokers from four groups: alcoholics, illicit stimulant abusers, concurrent abusers, and control subjects. Data were collected from 2001 to 2003. We hypothesized tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the opposing effects of acute nicotine administration, which is often presumed to be cognitively enhancing [5,6,7], and the chronic effects of other drugs of abuse, which are typically negative [8,9,10,11,12], the co-morbidity of nicotine and other substance dependence may be of direct relevance to the investigation of the long-term neurocognitive effects of chronic substance abuse. Consistent with this hypothesis are recent data from our own work, in which acute nicotine administration altered the typical performance patterns of alcohol [13] and stimulant dependent [14,15] participants on tasks assessing attentional functioning. Specifically, alcoholand stimulant-dependent individuals often exhibit deficits of attentional functioning [16]; which were not observed in our study when nicotine levels were stabilized throughout the testing session.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the opposing effects of acute nicotine administration, which is often presumed to be cognitively enhancing [5,6,7], and the chronic effects of other drugs of abuse, which are typically negative [8,9,10,11,12], the co-morbidity of nicotine and other substance dependence may be of direct relevance to the investigation of the long-term neurocognitive effects of chronic substance abuse. Consistent with this hypothesis are recent data from our own work, in which acute nicotine administration altered the typical performance patterns of alcohol [13] and stimulant dependent [14,15] participants on tasks assessing attentional functioning. Specifically, alcoholand stimulant-dependent individuals often exhibit deficits of attentional functioning [16]; which were not observed in our study when nicotine levels were stabilized throughout the testing session.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Carbon monoxide (CO) readings were obtained on the morning of testing and compared to screening values. Compliance was evidenced by a maximum CO reading of 12ppm or less or 50% of baseline CO [13,14,15]. Participants were presented with a standard breakfast, and a single caffeinated beverage was made available for individuals who regularly consumed caffeine in the morning.…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In healthy non-smokers and in individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders acute nicotine administration transiently improves some areas of neurocognition, most appreciably sustained attention (see Rezvani and Levin, 2001;Sacco et al, 2004). Whether these acute effects on neurocognition are manifested also in non-smoking alcoholics and other substance abusers is unclear (see Ceballos et al, 2005;Ceballos et al, 2006). The adverse effects of nicotine withdrawal on neurocognition are not typically apparent until 8-12 hours after last nicotine dose, at least in non-alcoholic chronic smokers (see Sacco et al, 2004;Mendrek et al, 2006;Xu et al, 2005).…”
Section: Functional Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such women are often more addicted (Burling and Burling 2003;CASA 2005), less able to resist cross-substance craving (Drobes et al 2000;McKee et al 2006;Rohsenow et al 2005), and less motivated to quit (Ceballos et al 2006). Although behaviors such as excessive drinking and cigarette smoking are amenable to interventions independently (Orleans 2004;Poudevigne and O'Connor 2006), accumulating evidence suggests that combining intervention strategies might be the most effective way to address concurrent alcohol use and cigarette smoking, regardless of whether such interventions are administered sequentially or simultaneously (Gulliver et al 2006;Kodl et al 2006;NIAAA 2007;Prochaska et al 2006;Ziedonis et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%