2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotine dose–concentration relationship and pregnancy outcomes in rat: Biologic plausibility and implications for future research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation of these studies was the route of nicotine dosing (via oral gavages, implantable osmotic minipump, subcutaneous intravenous injections, or parenteral bolus); these routes require high nicotine doses to achieve relevant plasma concentrations for heavy smokers that also cause maternal cardiovascular effects in rodents. Nicotine does not reproduce all the effects seen with cigarette smoke, leading us and others to believe that nicotine alone cannot cause the acute endothelial toxicity related to passive smoking (6) and that other constituents of cigarette smoke during pregnancy likely play a role in fetal growth restriction (29). It is important to note that the vascular effects reported here were observed 18 -19 h after the last smoke exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A limitation of these studies was the route of nicotine dosing (via oral gavages, implantable osmotic minipump, subcutaneous intravenous injections, or parenteral bolus); these routes require high nicotine doses to achieve relevant plasma concentrations for heavy smokers that also cause maternal cardiovascular effects in rodents. Nicotine does not reproduce all the effects seen with cigarette smoke, leading us and others to believe that nicotine alone cannot cause the acute endothelial toxicity related to passive smoking (6) and that other constituents of cigarette smoke during pregnancy likely play a role in fetal growth restriction (29). It is important to note that the vascular effects reported here were observed 18 -19 h after the last smoke exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Nicotine alone has previously been shown to reduce uterine blood flow in pregnant sheep and rats (8,11,42,43), mediated through release of epinephrine. However, some reports have shown no significant fetal growth restriction with nicotine or high levels of epinephrine (8,29,64). A limitation of these studies was the route of nicotine dosing (via oral gavages, implantable osmotic minipump, subcutaneous intravenous injections, or parenteral bolus); these routes require high nicotine doses to achieve relevant plasma concentrations for heavy smokers that also cause maternal cardiovascular effects in rodents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altered apoptosis is suggested as a mechanism for other birth defects (Edwards, 1998), but has not yet been suggested as a mechanism for gastroschisis. Of interest, pup weight, placental weight, and organ weight are unaffected by nicotine dosing, suggesting that other by-products of cigarette smoking are responsible for the impact on fetal growth (Hussein et al, 2007). Though nicotine produces vasoconstriction, which may decrease overall blood flow and nutrient supply, other tobacco toxins may influence abnormal development of the ventral body wall, and therefore other pathogenic mechanisms should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, some scientists believe that the potential neuroteratogenicity of nicotine is such that NRT should never be used at all in pregnancy and that even the heaviest of maternal smokers would expose their fetuses to increased risk by using NRT instead of smoking while pregnant. (Ginzel et al, 2007) However, this is not a consensus view and others dispute that appropriate doses of nicotine were used in the original rodent studies, believing that these were far higher than should have been used to draw conclusions about nicotinerelated harm from either using NRT or smoking by humans (Hussein et al, 2007).…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%