1986
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor contains multiple binding sites: evidence from binding of alpha-dendrotoxin.

Abstract: We have studied the stoichiometry of the binding of the long a-neurotoxins from the venom of Dendroaspis viridis (a-dendrotoxin) and Naja naja siamensis (a-cobratoxin) to the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor (AcChoR) from Torpedo californica electric organ. The number of toxin molecules bound to one AcChoR molecule was determined by simultaneous-quantitative gas-phase microsequencing of all the amino acid sequences present in AcChoR-aneurotoxin complexes. This method permits the use of homogeneous (nonrad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, this interpretation allows the prediction that the functional inactivation assay may have usefulness in dissecting sites and modes of nicotinic ligand action, including the long-noted idiosyncrasies (Rang and Ritter, 1970) in the actions of "metaphilic" ligands at nAChRs, and that pancuronium and alcuronium may not have open channel blocking activities found for d-TC and decamethonium. A third alternative is that selected antagonists and agonists share the ability to interact at novel regulatory sites (Takeyasu et al, 1983(Takeyasu et al, , 1986, some of which may interact differentially with neurotoxins (Hanley et al, 1978;Conti-Tronconi and Raftery, 1986;Bradley et al, 1987) or smaller ligands (Conti-Tronconi et al, 1982;Dunn and Raftery, 1982).…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Of Antagonist Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this interpretation allows the prediction that the functional inactivation assay may have usefulness in dissecting sites and modes of nicotinic ligand action, including the long-noted idiosyncrasies (Rang and Ritter, 1970) in the actions of "metaphilic" ligands at nAChRs, and that pancuronium and alcuronium may not have open channel blocking activities found for d-TC and decamethonium. A third alternative is that selected antagonists and agonists share the ability to interact at novel regulatory sites (Takeyasu et al, 1983(Takeyasu et al, , 1986, some of which may interact differentially with neurotoxins (Hanley et al, 1978;Conti-Tronconi and Raftery, 1986;Bradley et al, 1987) or smaller ligands (Conti-Tronconi et al, 1982;Dunn and Raftery, 1982).…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Of Antagonist Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified low affinity agonist-specific sites, which displayed properties that were consistent with the involvement of these sites in channel activation [12][13][14]. Supporting evidence for multiple binding sites has come from studies of α-dendrotoxin binding [15], photoaffinity labeling [16] and from flux studies of pre-formed receptor-ligand complexes [17]. In this report, we have characterized the binding of an agonist, epibatidine [18], to the Torpedo nAChR and directly demonstrate the presence of four agonist binding sites under equilibrium conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This group has claimed that agonists can still bind to the low-affinity sites after the high-affinity sites on the AChR have been blocked by curare or covalently labeled with bromoacetylcholine [21]. It has been reported that although the a,-toxin from N. naja siamensis has two binding sites on the AChR (one on each of the two ce-subunits), the a-toxin from Dendroaspis viridis has four binding sites on the AChR [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%