2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00715-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotinic–serotonergic interactions in brain and behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
2
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, these patterns may not be specific to nicotine effects on 5HT systems, since we found similar desensitization for cholinergic systems (Abreu-Villaça et al, 2004b;Seidler et al, 1992). Indeed, given the prominent role of cholinergic input in regulating 5HT synaptic activity (Cucchiaro and Commons, 2003;Rao et al, 2003;Seth et al, 2002), the parallel findings may reflect a primary effect of prenatal nicotine exposure on cholinergic synaptic activity and responsiveness, secondarily influencing 5HT systems (Abreu-Villaça et al, 2004b;Seidler et al, 1992;Slotkin, 1998Slotkin, , 2002Slotkin, , 2004. Superimposed on this overall effect, the cumulative neurotoxicity imposed by the combined prenatal and adolescent nicotine exposure may then account for the additional alterations in 5HT and AC responses that show directions of change opposite to those of either treatment alone (Abreu-Villaça et al, 2004a;Slotkin, 2002).…”
Section: Effects Of Prenatal Nicotine Exposure On the Response To Nicmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In fact, these patterns may not be specific to nicotine effects on 5HT systems, since we found similar desensitization for cholinergic systems (Abreu-Villaça et al, 2004b;Seidler et al, 1992). Indeed, given the prominent role of cholinergic input in regulating 5HT synaptic activity (Cucchiaro and Commons, 2003;Rao et al, 2003;Seth et al, 2002), the parallel findings may reflect a primary effect of prenatal nicotine exposure on cholinergic synaptic activity and responsiveness, secondarily influencing 5HT systems (Abreu-Villaça et al, 2004b;Seidler et al, 1992;Slotkin, 1998Slotkin, , 2002Slotkin, , 2004. Superimposed on this overall effect, the cumulative neurotoxicity imposed by the combined prenatal and adolescent nicotine exposure may then account for the additional alterations in 5HT and AC responses that show directions of change opposite to those of either treatment alone (Abreu-Villaça et al, 2004a;Slotkin, 2002).…”
Section: Effects Of Prenatal Nicotine Exposure On the Response To Nicmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Because the effects of nicotine on receptor binding decay more rapidly in the adult [39], this relationship cannot be the direct result of the amount of nicotine self-administered, and indeed, there was no significant (p=0.45) relationship detected between striatal receptor binding and nicotine self-administration during weeks three and four, the period immediately preceding the binding determination. The striatum is an important site for nicotine-elicited reward function [32] and nicotine effects on striatal monoamine systems contribute to nicotine withdrawal symptoms [33], especially the craving that tends to subvert attempts at quitting smoking [43]. In keeping with this interpretation, striatal reward-associated pathways are desensitized to non-smoking related inputs in smokers, so that further nicotine intake becomes a required to sustain reward function [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 It is widely accepted that the acute systemic administration of nicotine enhances the release of 5HT in several brain regions of rats. [25][26][27] In contrast to the acute treatment, chronic nicotine administration decreases the concentration and biosynthesis of 5HT in the hippocampus or frontal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%