“… Newborn costs included in a retrospective cohort study | Not specified | Costs; adverse effects of terbutaline, pregnancy prolongation, maternal and neonatal morbidityd | Not specified | Maternal antepartum and neonatal period until discharged from hospital | Low (9.5/22) | Tomczyk 2015 54 | Poland | Tertiary hospital | IV followed by continuous oral fenoterol vs IV for 48-72 hours only | Women at risk of labour at 24-34 weeks gestation | To compare cost and effectiveness of fenoterol therapy in pregnant women at risk of preterm labour in the hospital for two consecutive years: 2012, when fenoterol was widely used, and 2013, when restrictions were introduced. | Cost analysis alongside a retrospective cohort study | Not specified | Cost of hospitalisation; mean week of delivery, mode of delivery, neonatal weight, delivery at term, APGARs, Hb and CRP after delivery, betamethasone and antibiotic administration | Not specified | Period of hospitalisation | Low (10/22) |
Valdés 2012 53 | Chile | 3 Maternal-fetal units at tertiary hospitals | Nifedipine (oral) vs Fenoterol (intravenous) | Women at 22 to 34 weeks’ gestation in preterm labour | Compare efficacy of nifedipine and fenoterol as a first-line tocolytic agent in the management of threatened preterm labor. | Cost-minimisation analysis alongside randomised clinical trial | 2007-08 | Total costs; Outcomes from the RCT included: Clinical, metabolic, hemodynamic endpoints, the gestational age upon recruitment, effectiveness of the assigned tocolytic, latency period, adverse effects, the incidence of preterm delivery and perinatal outcomes. |
…”