2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NiftyNet: a deep-learning platform for medical imaging

Abstract: HighlightsAn open-source platform is implemented based on TensorFlow APIs for deep learning in medical imaging domain.A modular implementation of the typical medical imaging machine learning pipeline facilitates (1) warm starts with established pre-trained networks, (2) adapting existing neural network architectures to new problems, and (3) rapid prototyping of new solutions.Three deep-learning applications, including segmentation, regression, image generation and representation learning, are presented as conc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
314
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 509 publications
(315 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
314
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Geometric augmentations were sampled independently and combined as one affine transform, using random rotations (all axis ranging from -10 to 10 degrees), random shears ([0.5, 0.5]) and random scaling ([0.75, 1.5]). For the non-geometric augmentations we applied k-space motion artefact augmentation as described in [12] and bias field augmentation as implemented in [3]. We measure how useful these additional augmentations are in our experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric augmentations were sampled independently and combined as one affine transform, using random rotations (all axis ranging from -10 to 10 degrees), random shears ([0.5, 0.5]) and random scaling ([0.75, 1.5]). For the non-geometric augmentations we applied k-space motion artefact augmentation as described in [12] and bias field augmentation as implemented in [3]. We measure how useful these additional augmentations are in our experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used Tensorflow and implemented our models within the NiftyNet framework [41]. Models were trained on NVIDIA Titan Xp, P6000 and V100.…”
Section: A4 Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were randomly split between training (2420 simulated volumes over 19 subjects), validation (242 simulated volumes over two subjects) and testing (726 simulated volumes over six subjects). Networks were trained until convergence, as defined per performance on the validation set when over 1000 iterations have elapsed without decreases in the loss (a probabilistic version of the dice loss [11]), using NiftyNet [7], a deep learning framework designed for medical imaging. In a first instance, we compare the performance of 3D U-Net-Physics with that of base 3D U-Net (trained simply by excluding the physics branch), as well as GIF [2], a segmentation software based on geodesical information flows.…”
Section: Robustness To Acquisition Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%