2001
DOI: 10.1007/bf01651369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nightingales in space: song and extra-territorial forays of radio tagged song birds

Abstract: Most temperate zone passerines defend territories during the breeding season. Commonly the size of these territories is estimated by plotting the singing locations of the males. However, an individual's activities need not be restricted to the area used for singing. So far, only little quantitative information has been available to determine how the singing territory relates to the activity range of male songbirds. Here, we present a study in which we used radio-tracking techniques to collect quantitative data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By plotting observations of chat in southern Indiana, the mean territory size was 1.2 ha (SD 0.51, range 0.4-2.4) (Thompson and Nolan 1973); in Virginia, the territory size ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 ha (Dennis 1958); while in southern Illinois, the mean territory size of 0.13 ha (range 0.06-0.29) (Brewer 1955) was smaller. Our findings are consistent with other studies which reported that territory size defined through territory mapping (observations of males singing and perching) may be an underestimate of ter ritory size (the area used) (e.g., Naguib et al 2001;Anich et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By plotting observations of chat in southern Indiana, the mean territory size was 1.2 ha (SD 0.51, range 0.4-2.4) (Thompson and Nolan 1973); in Virginia, the territory size ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 ha (Dennis 1958); while in southern Illinois, the mean territory size of 0.13 ha (range 0.06-0.29) (Brewer 1955) was smaller. Our findings are consistent with other studies which reported that territory size defined through territory mapping (observations of males singing and perching) may be an underestimate of ter ritory size (the area used) (e.g., Naguib et al 2001;Anich et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Home ranges as determined by radio-tracking often overlapped, suggesting forays outside of a male's singing territory were most likely for reasons other than expanding his territory. These forays into neighbouring territories may be for foraging, extrapair copulations, to test a neighbour's attention, or to investigate a neighbour's breeding stage (Naguib et al 2001). Extra-pair paternity commonly occurs in Western Yellow-breasted Chats in the south Okanagan (Mino et al 2011), and forays into neighbouring territories possibly involve extra-pair copulations with neighbouring females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alpha males appear to be displaying their strength, testing the competitiveness of resident male(s), and perhaps trying to entice females to transfer to their group (Watts, 1994;Steenbeek, 1999). Indeed, in some species, males of greater quality perform more and suffer fewer incursions (e.g., mammals: P. thomasi, Steenbeek, 1999; birds: Luscinia megarhychos, Naguib et al, 2001; Geothlypis trichas, Pedersen et al, 2006). These encounters must necessarily be brief however, as alpha males could lose the females in their own group and put their own infants in danger if they are gone long from their group.…”
Section: Rank and Age Effects On Male Dispersal Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%