Nighttime Vitality and Its Relationship to Urban Diversity: An Exploratory Analysis in Shenzhen, China

Abstract

Relationship between urban diversity and urban vitality is imperative for guiding better design in urban development, though existing frameworks are not able to efficiently examine the relationship at multiple scales. In this article, we propose a new framework to integrate nighttime light (NTL) imagery and multisource urban data into multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) models to examine the varying relationship between diversity and vitality across space and time. NTL is used as a proxy for urban nighttime vitality. Public transport, taxi transit, and points of interest (POI) data are used to derive three aspects of urban diversity indices: ridership diversity, spatial interaction diversity, and built environment diversity. By comparing the models in holiday and non-holiday weeks in Shenzhen, China, the NTL-based vitality proxy was found to be strongly correlated with the urban diversity indices, given by the satisfactory goodness of fit (r-squared = 0.9) of the MGWR models. The spatially varying relationships between diversity indices and nighttime vitality were observed and patterns discussed. The analysis of the coefficients revealed the importance of stable public transport and fluctuating taxi trips for nighttime vitality. The new index proposed for the diversity of spatial interaction (DSI) is a strong indicator for nighttime vitality, adding to existing vitality indicators. Furthermore, this study found that DSI and density of catering (DOC) have less temporal variation, indicating their robustness in measuring nighttime vitality. This study provided empirical insights into how nighttime vitality is related to urban diversity, demonstrating new applications of NTL for intracity studies.

Intergenerational differences in the urban vibrancy of TOD: Impacts of the built environment on the activities of different age groups

“…Meanwhile, it is surprising that land-use mix is not associated with VI in either the overall model or the models for each age group, which is remarkably different from previous studies. For instance, some empirical studies in cities such as Shenzhen and Seoul show that land-use mix and spatial interaction diversity have a significant contribution to urban vibrancy ( 40 , 59 , 60 ). The reason may be as follow: People are able to accomplish their travel purposes in a relatively small range in TOD with a high land-use mix, which may restrict the mobility and redistribution of people.…”

Spatial variations of the third and fourth COVID-19 waves in Hong Kong: A comparative study using built environment and socio-demographic characteristics

“…Specifically, density reflects the activity density of a place that has often been calculated by population and building numbers per spatial unit. Diversity indicates the intensity of miscellaneous urban functions and services, while design assesses the urban structure, such as road networks and pedestrian-oriented infrastructure ( Zhang et al, 2021 ). Destination accessibility evaluates the ease of access to trip attractions, and distance to transit is often considered as the distance from the residences to the nearest public transit hubs.…”

Impact of built environment on residential online car-hailing trips: Based on MGWR model

“…To address this weakness, Fotheringham proposed the MGWR method in 2017. Yu et al in 2019 refined the statistical inference method for MGWR, offering the possibility of the general application of MGWR in empirical studies [ 23 , 34 , 35 ].…”