1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1989.tb03879.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke: a double-blind controlled study

Abstract: Nimodipine (BAY e 9736), a new dihydropyridine derivative, has been shown to reduce neurological deficits and mortality induced by acute cerebral ischemia in experimental studies. We investigated the effects of this calcium antagonist in patients with acute ischemic stroke through a randomized, double-blind, parallel-designed trial in which nimodipine was compared with placebo. Forty-one of 54 screened cases were found to fulfil the inclusion criteria (sudden occurrence of a focal neurological deficit secondar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, repeat analysis of data on the functional outcome of patients in this trial, by dichotomizing the score on the disability item in the modified Mathew scale, shows a difference that was not statistically significant. 7 The supposedly positive results of this first randomized controlled trial were followed by a small trial, 51 which showed similar results. In the introduction to that article, the authors refer to an animal experiment by Germano et al 52 Subsequent reports on larger clinical trials 3,4,53,54 refer in the introduction to a single positive animal experiment, to the proven effectiveness of nimodipine in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage, and primarily to the positive results of the first randomized controlled trial with nimodipine in ischemic stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, repeat analysis of data on the functional outcome of patients in this trial, by dichotomizing the score on the disability item in the modified Mathew scale, shows a difference that was not statistically significant. 7 The supposedly positive results of this first randomized controlled trial were followed by a small trial, 51 which showed similar results. In the introduction to that article, the authors refer to an animal experiment by Germano et al 52 Subsequent reports on larger clinical trials 3,4,53,54 refer in the introduction to a single positive animal experiment, to the proven effectiveness of nimodipine in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage, and primarily to the positive results of the first randomized controlled trial with nimodipine in ischemic stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…14 The authors found a correlation between nimodipine-induced reduction in BP and unfavorable outcome. The trial design of INWEST was based on the early positive results of oral nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke 15,16 and a positron emission tomography study 17 of intravenously administered nimodipine, which indicated a statistically significant beneficial effect on long-term recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Like other calcium channel blockers, nimodipine has an antihypertensive property, and one of its main mechanisms of action is vasodilatation, causing decreased peripheral vascular resistance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Forty-six patients with ischemic carotid artery territory stroke [National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] were enrolled within 24 h of symptom onset. In part A, patients were randomized 3:1 to a single bolus of Cerestat or placebo.…”
Section: Table 2 Results From Venus Study Subgroup Analyses Of Patiementioning
confidence: 99%