2017
DOI: 10.1080/10402381.2016.1263693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nine years of phosphorus management with lanthanum modified bentonite (Phoslock) in a eutrophic, shallow swimming lake in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result contrasts with some studies that showed a rapid decline in phytoplankton abundance, yet they combined a coagulant with LMB as ballast, effectively clearing the water column [20,65]. Other studies used only LMB and also reported a decline or control of cyanobacteria [61], or a short-lived positive effect [19], but no information on the speed of the response, while in another study a clear lag period of several months was observed [66]. In our study, the increase in cyanobacteria in controls and sole LMB treatments after one month does not seem to be caused by recruitment of settled cyanobacteria as a similar phenomenon should have then occurred in the dredged enclosures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result contrasts with some studies that showed a rapid decline in phytoplankton abundance, yet they combined a coagulant with LMB as ballast, effectively clearing the water column [20,65]. Other studies used only LMB and also reported a decline or control of cyanobacteria [61], or a short-lived positive effect [19], but no information on the speed of the response, while in another study a clear lag period of several months was observed [66]. In our study, the increase in cyanobacteria in controls and sole LMB treatments after one month does not seem to be caused by recruitment of settled cyanobacteria as a similar phenomenon should have then occurred in the dredged enclosures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Therefore, primary production is a more probable explanation for the observed increase in pH in these treatments. This is unexpected as sufficient reduction of SRP by LMB can strongly hamper algal growth, as evidenced in laboratory experiments [15] and whole-lake applications [19,61], yet there are also reports that algal growth was not inhibited after LMB application [62]. Both an insufficient reduction in SRP and potential luxury consumption of P by the cyanobacteria are possible explanations for continued primary production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a similar study, a follow-up research was conducted of phosphorus management with LMB in an eutrophic, shallow swimming lake in Germany, showing the phenomenon of excess phosphorous concentrations as a result of human-generated nutrients [24]. The role of external phosphorous inputs from water-flow-and possibly other external sources-was also discussed upon the water treatment of two lakes in North America.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summarizing the approached of environmental remediation through management of aquatic eutrophication and aquatic ecosystems they are noteworthy: the in situ sediment remediation using the modified clays of LMB and modified zeolite, to control fluvial nitrogen and phosphorus sedimental loading and intermittent aeration [21], the application of LMB to control the high transparency and the low levels of soluble phosphorus at lakes from polluted inflows to lakes by domestic and agriculture mixed wastewater [23], where LMB-applied sinks to the lake bottom intercepts the upward flux of internal load from sediment P release [25]. Such P management can: increase the suspension of P mass [26,30]; decrease the intensity of mineralization processes, prevent large algal and cyanobacterial blooms, enhance the swimming and the recreation uses for lakes [24]; decrease the levels of water column total P, causing a shift form mobile sediment P to residual fractions [22]; control eutrophication while mitigating cyanobacterial nuisance [31]; advance novel technologies to inactivate phosphorus and achieve improved water quality by developing dense submerged macrophytes beds [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elimination/decrease of cyanobacterial blooms, changes in species composition, and decreases of phytoplankton abundance that were observed in Swarzędzkie were related to the use of biomanipulation (fish removal and fish stocking) [19]. Phytoplankton decrease has also been recorded in other lakes under restoration, e.g., Durowskie [33], Ringsjön [35], Bärensee [36], and hypereutrophic ponds [37]. Fluctuations of phytoplankton abundance and biomass observed in Swarzędzkie as well as in Durowskie [33], Rusałka [38], Lake Głęboczek [39], or Maltański Reservoir [10] are a significant feature of the phytoplankton reaction to restoration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%